Cited by 38Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes

Feasibility of Group-Based Multiple Virtual Reality Sessions to Reduce Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms in Persons Living in Residential Aged Care

Brimelow, Rachel E., Thangavelu, Karthick, Beattie, Romana, Dissanayaka, Nadeeka N.·2022·Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Abstract

Objectives To assess the feasibility of using group-based fully immersive virtual reality (VR) across multiple sessions to reduce behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSs), including depression, anxiety, and agitated behaviors, in cognitively diverse aged care residents. Design A 6-session feasibility trial was conducted within a residential aged care facility using convenience sampling to recruit N = 25 residents of varying cognitive capacity. Groups of 5 residents viewed 360-degree videos on a wireless head-mounted display to provide fully immersive VR experiences. Setting and participants Half of the participants recruited from the 160-bed facility had a diagnosis of dementia (48%), whereas assessment with the Psychogeriatric Assessment Scale for cognitive impairment revealed that 64% experienced cognitive impairment (mild 20%, moderate 16%, and severe 28%). Additionally, 32% of participants had an existing anxiety or depression diagnosis. Measures The Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item, and Cohen Mansfield Agitation Inventory-Short were used to assess changes in persisting BPS pre- to postintervention period. The Person-Environment Apathy Rating apathy subscale, Observed Emotions Rating Scale, and a visual analog scale (Smileometer) were used to assess immediate mood responses from residents at every VR session. VR tolerability and resident feedback was also recorded. Results Pleasure (z = -5.892, P Conclusions and implication…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.07.026

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brimelow, R. E., Thangavelu, K., Beattie, R., & Dissanayaka, N. N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Dissanayaka, Nadeeka N.
Venue
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
831-837.e2
ISSN
1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3194308176
Cited by
38
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Keywords
virtual reality, group intervention, behavioral and psychological symptoms, dementia, nursing homes, depression, agitation, anxiety, apathy, immersive virtual reality, 360-degree video, cognitive impairment, feasibility
MeSH terms
Virtual Reality, Aged, Dementia, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Apathy, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review