Feasibility of assessing older patients in the acute setting: findings from the Copenhagen PROTECT study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Older patients are typically underrepresented in clinical trials despite representing a major proportion of the patient population. We aim to describe the feasibility of performing body composition measures, physical function measures, and patient-reported questionnaires within the first 24 hours of admission in a large sample of older acutely admitted medical patients. In addition, we aim to characterize patients with missing measurements. DESIGN: Secondary analyses of cross-sectional data from a cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1071 acutely admitted patients aged ≥65 years from the acute medical ward at Bispebjerg Hospital, were enrolled within the first 24 hours of hospitalization. METHODS: Body composition was investigated using direct segmental multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analyses (DSM-BIA) and physical function was assessed using hand grip strength (HGS) and the 30-second sit-to-stand test (STS). The orientation-memory-concentration test (OMC) was used to evaluate the prevalence of cognitive impairments within 24 hours of hospitalization, and the OMC in conjunction with the Strength, Assistance walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls questionnaire (SARC-F) was used to assess the feasibility of patient-reported outcomes (PROs). RESULTS: Mean age was 78.8 ± 7.8 years (53.0% female). HGS was performed in 96.2% of the enrolled patients, whereas the PRO, 30-second STS, and DSM-BIA were performed in 91.2%, 69.2%, and 59.8% of patients, respectively. The main barrier for performing the 30-second STS and body composition measurements was an inability to mobilize the patient from the hospital bed. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The assessment of HGS and PROs show excellent feasibility in clinical research including older patients, even when the patients are enrolled and tested within 24 hours of an acute admission. Assessments of DSM-BIA and the 30-second STS show good feasibility but are less feasible in immobile patients often presenting as more frail, weaker, and cognitively impaired.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Physical function measures may sometimes be unfeasible in frail individuals such as acutely hospitalized or institutionalized older adults.
“may sometimes be unfeasible in frail individuals such as acutely hospitalized or institutionalized older adults (Kamper et al., 2023)”
From Ultrasound-derived muscle variables and physical function in older adults: A scoping review. (2026) · cites this paper as Kamper et al., 2023
Cites
Bischoff-Ferrari, H. A., Orav, J. E., Kanis, J. A., Rizzoli, R., Schlögl, M., Staehelin, H. B., Willett, W. C., & Dawson-Hughes, B. (2015) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-015-3194-y · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Soysal, P., Hurst, C., Demurtas, J., Firth, J., Howden, R., Yang, L., Tully, M. A., Koyanagi, A., Ilie, P. C., López-Sánchez, G. F., et al. (2021) · Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.009 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ultrasound-derived muscle variables and physical function in older adults: A scoping review.
Phillip, J. G., Brockhattingen, K. K., Kaarsbo, T., Kristensen, M. T., Ryg, J., Suetta, C., Masud, T., & Minet, L. R. (2026) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2026.106151 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Kamper, R. S., Nygaard, H., Ekmann, A., Schultz, M., Hansen, S. K., Hansen, P., Pressel, E., Rasmussen, J., & Suetta, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
- Bispebjerg Hospital (DK)
- Corresponding author
- Kamper, Rikke S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1898-1903
- ISSN
- 1525-8610 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4385650638
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Medical Directors Association (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0052826)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- elderly patients, acute medical admissions, body composition, grip strength, physical function, sit-to-stand test, patient-reported outcomes, cognitive impairment, frailty, SARC-F, immobility, underrepresentation in clinical trials
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Hand Strength, Sarcopenia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review