Cited by 369Nutritional Studies and DietAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactNutrition, Health, and Society Studies

Nutrient profiles of vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns

Open access
Rizzo, Nico S., Jaceldo-Siegl, Karen, Sabate, Joan, Fraser, Gary E.·2013·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Differences in nutrient profiles between vegetarian and nonvegetarian dietary patterns reflect nutritional differences that can contribute to the development of disease.Objective Our aim was to compare nutrient intakes between dietary patterns characterized by consumption or exclusion of meat and dairy products.Design We conducted a cross-sectional study of 71,751 subjects (mean age=59 years) from the Adventist Health Study 2. Data were collected between 2002 and 2007. Participants completed a 204-item validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Dietary patterns compared were nonvegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco vegetarian, lacto-ovo vegetarian, and strict vegetarian. Analysis of covariance was used to analyze differences in nutrient intakes by dietary patterns and was adjusted for age, sex, and race. Body mass index and other relevant demographic data were reported and compared by dietary pattern using χ(2) tests and analysis of variance.Results Many nutrient intakes varied significantly between dietary patterns. Nonvegetarians had the lowest intakes of plant proteins, fiber, beta carotene, and magnesium compared with those following vegetarian dietary patterns, and the highest intakes of saturated, trans, arachidonic, and docosahexaenoic fatty acids. The lower tails of some nutrient distributions in strict vegetarians suggested inadequate intakes by a portion of the subjects. Energy intake was similar among dietary patterns at close to 2,000 kcal/day, with the exception of semi-vegetarians, who had an intake of 1,707 kcal/day. Mean body mass index was highest in nonvegetarians (mean=28.7 [standard deviation=6.4]) and lowest in strict vegetarians (mean=24.0 [standard deviation=4.8]).Conclusions Nutrient profiles varied markedly among dietary patterns that were defined by meat and dairy intakes. These differences are of interest in the etiology of obesity and chronic diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2013.06.349

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar vitamin B12 status data to EPIC-Oxford have been reproduced in United States and Germany large cohort studies.

    “with similar data reproduced in United States and Germany large cohort studies [225, 235]”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [225]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 369

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [18]Rizzo NS Sabate J Jaceldo-Siegl K Fraser GE Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome: the adventist health study 2 Diabetes Care 2011 34 1225 1227 21411506 PMC3114510
  2. [21]Fraser GE Diet, Life Expectancy and Chronic Disease 2003 New York Oxford University Press

Authors
Rizzo, N. S., Jaceldo-Siegl, K., Sabate, J., & Fraser, G. E.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Corresponding author
Rizzo, Nico S.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-12
Volume
113
Issue
12
Pages
1610-1619
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970483577
Cited by
369
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19
FWCI
19.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U01CA152939, 1R01-CA-94594, R01CA094594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
Keywords
vegetarian diet, dietary habits, nutrient intake, meat consumption, dairy consumption, plant proteins, dietary fiber, omega-3 fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, magnesium, beta-carotene, energy intake, body mass index, obesity, Adventist Health Study-2
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcohol Drinking, Animals, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Dairy Products, Diet, Diet Surveys, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, Humans, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Nutritive Value, Plant Proteins, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Diet, Vegetarian, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review