Cited by 65Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorHealth and Lifestyle StudiesDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Challenges, Opportunities, and Motivators for Developing and Applying Food Literacy in a University Setting: A Qualitative Study

Malan, Hannah, Watson, Tyler D., Slusser, Wendelin, Glik, Deborah, Rowat, Amy C., Prelip, Michael·2020·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

Background Evolving norms and complex food environments may require new skill sets and mind-sets to maintain a healthy diet. Food literacy acknowledges the influence of external factors in shaping a person's development and application of the knowledge, skills, and behaviors required for healthy eating. Food literacy among college students is not well understood; however, higher education presents a unique opportunity for promoting food literacy.Objective This study aimed to identify a range of challenges, opportunities, and motivators for students to develop and apply food literacy in a university setting.Design Eleven focus groups were conducted with four student subpopulations: three with residential undergraduates, three with off-campus undergraduates, three with graduate students, and two with students using food security resources.Participants/setting Eighty-two students enrolled at a large, diverse, public university in an urban setting in California.Analysis Guided by an ecological perspective, transcripts were analyzed using an integrated approach. This involved an inductive development of themes and deductive organization of themes according to research aims.Results We developed a novel model as a starting point for understanding and addressing the dynamic challenges, opportunities, and motivators for students to develop and apply food literacy. Challenges include the physical food environment, confusing information, capacity and resource constraints, and social tensions. Opportunities include media and the Internet, academic courses, peer learning, campus resources, and dining halls. Motivators include health, social responsibility, personal development, and enjoyment and bonding.Conclusions Students view college as an appropriate time to develop food literacy and the university as a trusted partner. However, efforts to promote food literacy should acknowledge perceived challenges and varying motivations for engaging with food.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2019.06.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 65

Authors
Malan, H., Watson, T. D., Slusser, W., Glik, D., Rowat, A. C., & Prelip, M.
Corresponding author
Malan, Hannah
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
120
Issue
1
Pages
33-44
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973615165
Cited by
65
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Lifestyle Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
food literacy, university students, food security, healthy eating, student motivation, peer learning, campus dining, ecological perspective
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Adult, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Motivation, Students, Universities, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Young Adult, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review