Cited by 36Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Factors impacting trauma treatment practice patterns: the convergence/divergence of science and practice

Sprang, Ginny, Craig, Carlton, Clark, James·2008·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Objective This study surveyed the practice patterns of behavioral health providers to determine the degree to which providers in this study utilized evidence-based approaches when dealing with traumatized individuals and the extent to which these practice methods vary as a result of population density or provider characteristics.Method A survey instrument was designed specifically for this study. The Trauma Practices Questionnaire (TPQ) a 22-item trauma treatment practice utilization scale was mailed to all licensed or certified behavioral health providers in a southern state (N=5752). Responses of 1121 professionals who represent seven disciplines are reported.Results Gender and the acquisition of specialized trauma training impacted the way providers practice. Discipline-specific differences became statistically nonsignificant when controlling for gender. Several areas of guideline convergence were uncovered (e.g. the frequent use of CBT) as well as practices that were divergent from best practice recommendations, especially with regards to the use of psychopharmacological interventions.Conclusions Results highlight issues related to translational research dissemination and training practices, as well as factors that might affect clinician's acceptance of and compliance with evidence-based practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.02.003

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sprang, G., Craig, C., & Clark, J.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Sprang, Ginny
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
162-174
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128450215
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
trauma treatment, evidence-based practice, behavioral health providers, clinical practice patterns, research-practice gap, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychopharmacological interventions, trauma training, gender differences, translational research, clinical guidelines, trauma-informed care
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavioral Medicine, Clonidine, Female, Health Services Research, Humans, Male, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Family, Population Density, Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rural Population, Science, Sex Factors, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Urban Population, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Logistic Models, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Stress Disorders, Traumatic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review