CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social performance deficits in social anxiety disorder: Reality during conversation and biased perception during speech

Voncken, Marisol J., Bögels, Susan M.·2008·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cognitive models emphasize that patients with social anxiety disorder (SAD) are mainly characterized by biased perception of their social performance. In addition, there is a growing body of evidence showing that SAD patients suffer from actual deficits in social interaction. To unravel what characterizes SAD patients the most, underestimation of social performance (defined as the discrepancy between self-perceived and observer-perceived social performance), or actual (observer-perceived) social performance, 48 patients with SAD and 27 normal control participants were observed during a speech and conversation. Consistent with the cognitive model of SAD, patients with SAD underestimated their social performance relative to control participants during the two interactions, but primarily during the speech. Actual social performance deficits were clearly apparent in the conversation but not in the speech. In conclusion, interactions that pull for more interpersonal skills, like a conversation, elicit more actual social performance deficits whereas, situations with a performance character, like a speech, bring about more cognitive distortions in patients with SAD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.001

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–142 of 142

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Voncken, M. J., & Bögels, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Voncken, Marisol J.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1384-1392
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.02.001
OpenAlex
W2151526020
Cited by
145
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, social performance, self-perception, viewer perception, speech performance, conversation, social skills, cognitive distortions
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Male, Models, Psychological, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Speech, Bias, Control Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review