Cited by 24Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingGender and Technology in Education

Gender bias in the sixteen-item Anxiety Sensitivity Index: An application of polytomous differential item functioning

Van Dam, Nicholas T., Earleywine, Mitch, Forsyth, John P.·2009·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Gender differences in measures of anxiety sensitivity (AS) are similar to gender differences across anxiety disorders; females exhibit higher levels of AS and a greater prevalence of anxiety disorders than males. The current study confirms higher scores on the Anxiety Sensitivity Index (ASI) in females. Further analysis reveals, however, that gender differences on the ASI may arise from a single item's bias against women. Four different statistics examining differential item functioning (DIF) indicate that women are more likely to endorse the item, "It scares me when I feel faint", even if they score no higher on the ASI than males. Removing this biased item does not alter internal consistency of the scale, but eliminates the significant gender difference. The results suggest that differences on the ASI require careful interpretation as item bias may artificially inflate ASI scores in females.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.07.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Dam, N. T., Earleywine, M., & Forsyth, J. P.
Affiliations
University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
256-259
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095386625
Cited by
24
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH6010701)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
Keywords
anxiety sensitivity, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, gender differences, differential item functioning, scale internal consistency, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Prejudice, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review