Cited by 48Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAttachment and Relationship DynamicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Parenting practices and their relation to anxiety in young adulthood

Reitman, David, Asseff, Joan·2010·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Two-hundred introductory psychology students and their parents participated in a study of parenting perceptions and trait anxiety. Using student perceptions of parenting, this study replicates and extends research on the relation between parental control/autonomy granting, rejection/acceptance, and trait anxiety. The study was notable for incorporating data concerning both maternal and paternal influence in the model. Based upon prior research, parental control, parental rejection, and parent anxiety were expected to be associated with student anxiety. Further, perceptions of maternal parenting were expected to emerge as stronger correlates of student anxiety than paternal factors. Results indicated that for both females and males, perceptions of maternal control and paternal acceptance proved to have the strongest relations with student anxiety. However, large differences between males and females emerged in the model, with maternal control and paternal acceptance proving to be significant correlates only for female undergraduates. Maternal, but not paternal, self-reports of trait anxiety were related to student trait anxiety, but the relation was marginally significant in this sample.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.03.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 38 · Cited by 48

Authors
Reitman, D., & Asseff, J.
Affiliations
  • Nova Southeastern University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Corresponding author
Reitman, David
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
565-572
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068949995
Cited by
48
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
parenting practices, trait anxiety, early adulthood, parental control, autonomy granting, parental rejection, parental acceptance, maternal influence, paternal effects, gender differences, parental anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Perception, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review