The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A multisite randomized controlled effectiveness trial of cognitive processing therapy for military-related posttraumatic stress disorder
Abstract
Cognitive processing therapy (CPT) is currently applied in military veteran mental health services in many countries. This study tests the effectiveness of community-administered CPT for military-related PTSD under randomized controlled conditions. Fifty-nine treatment-seeking veterans with military-related PTSD were randomly allocated to receive 12 twice-weekly 60 min sessions of CPT or an equivalent period of usual treatment at veterans' community based counseling services. Intent to treat analyses found significantly greater improvement for participants receiving CPT over usual treatment at post-treatment and 3 month follow-up. CPT also produced greater improvements in anxiety, depression, social and dyadic relationships than usual treatment. No CPT related adverse events occurred during the trial. This trial reports the first randomized controlled trial evidence that CPT is an effective treatment for military PTSD and co-morbid conditions when compared to usual treatment and delivered in community settings by clinicians from diverse disciplines, preferred treatment orientation and levels of experience.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“outcome assessors were blinded in only six studies (33%; Baker et al. 2006;Forbes et al. 2012;Mills et al. 2012;Forsyth et al. 2017;Shawyer et al. 2017;Kelly et al. 2020).”
From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Forbes et al. 2012
In the citing paper
“Only three of 18 studies (17%) reported that the sample size was sufficiently large enough to be confident in the findings with at least 80% power (Hugo et al. 2002;Forbes et al. 2012;Meadows et al. 2019).”
From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Forbes et al. 2012
In the citing paper
“Four of five studies that examined substance misuse reported significant reductions in participants' consumption of alcohol (Forbes et al. 2012), tobacco (Baker et al. 2006;Ashton et al. 2015) and other drug use (Nagel et al. 2009).”
From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Forbes et al. 2012
In the citing paper
“Specifically, participants who engaged in cognitive processing therapy had significant reductions in depressive, anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms (Forbes et al. 2012).”
From Effect of community mental health care programs in Australia: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Forbes et al. 2012
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.).
Lachenbruch, P. A., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290095 · Cited by 37,421
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
(1998) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · Cited by 19,139
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
The mini international neuropsychiatric interview
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Hergueta, T., & Weiller, E. (1998) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0924-9338(99)80239-9 · Cited by 5,899
(2001) · Cited by 5,455
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Herman, D. S., Huska, J. A., & Keane, T. M. (1993). The PTSD checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the 9th Annual Conference of the ISTSS, San Antonio.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Katzman, M. A., Bleau, P., Blier, P., Chokka, P., Kjernisted, K., Van Ameringen, M., & the Canadian Anxiety Guidelines Initiative Group on behalf of the Anxiety Disorders Association of Canada/Association Canadienne des troubles anxieux and McGill University (2014) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/1471-244x-14-s1-s1 · Cited by 1,090
“Cognitive therapy approaches have been used effectively in treating PTSD following sexual or interpersonal violence [897-901], civilian trauma [902-908], and military trauma [909-914].”
BackgroundPsychotherapy for Military-Related PTSD: A Review of Randomized Clinical Trials
Steenkamp, M. M., Litz, B. T., Hoge, C. W., & Marmar, C. R. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.8370 · Cited by 958
Cusack, K., Jonas, D. E., Forneris, C. A., Wines, C., Sonis, J., Middleton, J. C., Feltner, C., Brownley, K. A., Olmsted, K. R., Greenblatt, A., et al. (2016) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2015.10.003 · Cited by 865
Psychological therapies for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults
Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Andrew, M., Cooper, R., & Lewis, C. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003388.pub4 · Cited by 829
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders: An update on the empirical evidence
Kaczkurkin, A. N., & Foa, E. B. (2015) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2015.17.3/akaczkurkin · Cited by 523
Metadata
- Authors
- Forbes, D., Lloyd, D., Nixon, R. D. V., Elliott, P., Varker, T., Perry, D., Bryant, R. A., & Creamer, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Flinders University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Forbes, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 442-452
- ISSN
- 0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983685871
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14
- FWCI
- 18.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Australian Government
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Keywords
- cognitive processing therapy, post-traumatic stress disorder, military veterans, community-based treatment, psychotherapy effectiveness, anxiety, depression, interpersonal relationships, dyads, comorbidities, adverse events
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Combat Disorders, Depression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
