CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive behavior therapy versus interpersonal psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder delivered via smartphone and computer: A randomized controlled trial

Dagöö, Jesper, Asplund, Robert Persson, Bsenko, Helene Andersson, Hjerling, Sofia, Holmberg, Anna, Westh, Susanne, Öberg, Louise, Ljótsson, Brjánn, Carlbring, Per, Furmark, Tomas, Andersson, Gerhard·2014·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this study, a previously evaluated guided Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder (SAD) was adapted for mobile phone administration (mCBT). The treatment was compared with a guided self-help treatment based on interpersonal psychotherapy (mIPT). The treatment platform could be accessed through smartphones, tablet computers, and standard computers. A total of 52 participants were diagnosed with SAD and randomized to either mCBT (n=27) or mIPT (n=25). Measures were collected at pre-treatment, during the treatment, post-treatment and 3-month follow-up. On the primary outcome measure, the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale - self-rated, both groups showed statistically significant improvements. However, mCBT performed significantly better than mIPT (between group Cohen's d=0.64 in favor of mCBT). A larger proportion of the mCBT group was classified as responders at post-treatment (55.6% versus 8.0% in the mIPT group). We conclude that CBT for SAD can be delivered using modern information technology. IPT delivered as a guided self-help treatment may be less effective in this format.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 68 references

2 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–121 of 121

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Dagöö, J., Asplund, R. P., Bsenko, H. A., Hjerling, S., Holmberg, A., Westh, S., Öberg, L., Ljótsson, B., Carlbring, P., Furmark, T., & Andersson, G.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Mid Sweden University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Gerhard
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
410-417
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003
OpenAlex
W2158300843
Semantic Scholar
48f31b13b96a48532eff68b4ae4334b4597aaafc
Cited by
121
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 3
FWCI
22.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Linköpings Universitet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, online therapy, guided self-help, treatment response, digital mental health interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Self Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review