CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does attention bias modification improve attentional control? A double-blind randomized experiment with individuals with social anxiety disorder

Open access
Heeren, Alexandre, Mogoaşe, Cristina, McNally, Richard J., Schmitz, Anne, Philippot, Pierre·2015·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

People with anxiety disorders often exhibit an attentional bias for threat. Attention bias modification (ABM) procedure may reduce this bias, thereby diminishing anxiety symptoms. In ABM, participants respond to probes that reliably follow non-threatening stimuli (e.g., neutral faces) such that their attention is directed away from concurrently presented threatening stimuli (e.g., disgust faces). Early studies showed that ABM reduced anxiety more than control procedures lacking any contingency between valenced stimuli and probes. However, recent work suggests that no-contingency training and training toward threat cues can be as effective as ABM in reducing anxiety, implying that any training may increase executive control over attention, thereby helping people inhibit their anxious thoughts. Extending this work, we randomly assigned participants with DSM-IV diagnosed social anxiety disorder to either training toward non-threat (ABM), training toward threat, or no-contingency condition, and we used the attention network task (ANT) to assess all three components of attention. After two training sessions, subjects in all three conditions exhibited indistinguishably significant declines from baseline to post-training in self-report and behavioral measures of anxiety on an impromptu speech task. Moreover, all groups exhibited similarly significant improvements on the alerting and executive (but not orienting) components of attention. Implications for ABM research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.007

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 134

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Heeren, A., Mogoaşe, C., McNally, R. J., Schmitz, A., & Philippot, P.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
29
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.10.007
OpenAlex
W2085831037
Cited by
134
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14
FWCI
20.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Belgian French Community
  • Belgian National Funds
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
attentional bias modification, social anxiety disorder, attentional control, executive function, alerting, orienting, threat cues, anxiety reduction, Attention Network Task
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Attention, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Thinking, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Executive Function, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review