Cited by 20Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Group schema therapy versus group cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with social anxiety disorder and comorbid avoidant personality disorder: A randomized controlled trial

Open access
Baljé, Astrid E., Greeven, Anja, Deen, Mathijs, van Giezen, Anne E., Arntz, Arnoud, Spinhoven, Philip·2024·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Background Patients with social anxiety (SAD) and comorbid avoidant personality disorder (AVPD) are severely impaired. Group cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) is considered an effective treatment for SAD. More knowledge on treatment of SAD with comorbid AVPD is needed. Schema therapy, developed for personality and chronic mental disorders, may be a promising treatment. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial in an outpatient population (n = 154) with both SAD and AVPD. Group Schema Therapy (GST) and GCBT were compared on SAD symptoms (Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale) and manifestations of AVPD (Avoidant Personality Disorder Severity Index). Results Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant differences between treatments at 3 months post-treatment and one-year follow-up. Both modalities led to significant and substantial improvements. No significant between-differences were found in depressive symptoms (Inventory of Depressive Symptoms) and quality of life (World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF). Per-protocol analysis showed similar outcomes and no significant differences in recovery from SAD and AVPD. Significantly more patients completed GST. Conclusion GST and GCBT are valuable treatments for SAD with comorbid AVPD. The higher treatment retention in ST indicates ST is more acceptable than GCBT. Future studies should focus on enhancing treatment effects and improving retention to GCBT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102860

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 60 · Cited by 20

Authors
Baljé, A. E., Greeven, A., Deen, M., van Giezen, A. E., Arntz, A., & Spinhoven, P.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Baljé, Astrid E.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-06
Volume
104
Pages
102860
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394695446
Cited by
20
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Fonds Psychische Gezondheid (2013 6778)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
group schema therapy, group cognitive behavioral therapy, social anxiety disorder, avoidant personality disorder, comorbidities, treatment retention, treatment acceptability, depressive symptoms, quality of life
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review