Cited by 73Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPain Management and Opioid Use

Strategies and policies to address the opioid epidemic: a case study of Ohio

Open access
Penm, Jonathan, MacKinnon, Neil J., Boone, Jill M., Ciaccia, Antonio, McNamee, Cameron, Winstanley, Erin L.·2017·Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the strategies and policies implemented in Ohio to improve opioid safety and to discuss the role that pharmacists can play in implementing, promoting, and enhancing the effectiveness of these policies. SETTING: Ohio has the fifth highest rate of drug overdose deaths (24.6 deaths per 100,000) in the United States. Unintentional drug overdose has become the leading cause of injury-related death in Ohio. In 2015, there were 3050 overdose deaths in Ohio, and in 2014 there were an estimated 12,847 overdose events reversed by emergency medical services with naloxone. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: Not applicable. PRACTICE POLICY INNOVATION: In 2011, the Governor's Cabinet Opiate Action Team was created to implement a multifaceted strategy, in part (1) to promote the responsible use of opioids, (2) to reduce the supply of opioids, and (3) to support overdose prevention and expand access to naloxone. Innovations to assist these goals include the development of Ohio guidelines on the responsible use of opioids, mandatory use of Ohio's prescription drug monitoring program, closing pill mills, promotion of drug take-back programs and increased access to naloxone and public health campaigns. EVALUATION: Not applicable. RESULTS: Since the development of the Governor's Cabinet Opiate Action Team, there were 81 million fewer doses of opioids dispensed to Ohio patients in 2015 compared with 782 million doses dispensed in 2011. As such, the proportion of unintentional drug overdose deaths involving prescription opioids has reduced from 45% in 2011 to 22% in 2015. CONCLUSION: Strong political support was crucial in Ohio to facilitate the rapid implementation opioid overdose prevention programs and the promotion of public awareness campaigns. However, the misuse and abuse of prescription opioids are complex problems requiring a comprehensive and multifaceted approach. Pharmacists are identified as a crucial component of the state strategy to addressing opioid abuse by promoting responsible prescribing and adopting prevention practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.001

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 2016, Ohio passed a law that requires pharmacists to review a patient's PMDP history before dispensing a new controlled substance, encouraging denial to some patients and thereby taking a more proactive role in pain management.

    “In 2016, Ohio passed a law that requires pharmacists to review a patient's PMDP history before dispensing a new controlled substance, encouraging denial to some patients and thereby taking a more proactive role in pain management (194).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Beeghly C Response to Ohio's prescription drug overdose epidemic: prescribing guidelines Proceedings of the Preventing Injury: From Research to Practice to People Conference 2013 Sept. 30–Oct. 1 Ann Arbor, MI University of Michigan Injury Center 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Penm, J., MacKinnon, N. J., Boone, J. M., Ciaccia, A., McNamee, C., & Winstanley, E. L.
Affiliations
West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Penm, Jonathan
Venue
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
S148-S153
ISSN
1544-3191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2587448567
Cited by
73
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 3
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104942)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
opioid epidemic, prescription opioid misuse, opioid overdose prevention, naloxone access, prescription drug monitoring programs, drug take-back programs, drug overdose deaths
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Health Policy, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Ohio, Pharmaceutical Services, Pharmacists, Public Health, Professional Role, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review