Using a pharmacist–community health worker collaboration to address medication adherence barriers
Abstract
Objective Pharmacists are positioned to evaluate and educate patients regarding medication adherence; however, opportunities exist to leverage a collaborative approach in eliciting barriers encountered by patients, especially in minority groups. Community health workers (CHWs) are individuals from the communities who form relationships with patients and help increase their access to health care resources. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaboration between CHWs and pharmacists in identifying and addressing medication adherence barriers faced by hypertensive patients. Methods After receiving training in medication therapy management support, CHWs from the South East American Indian Council collaborated with students and pharmacists from the Center for Quality Medication Management at the University of Florida to identify and address medication adherence barriers encountered by hypertensive patients who were mainly Native American or black. The CHWs documented information from the patient interviews during the initial and follow-up visits. The team collaborated to identify intervention opportunities on the basis of the adherence barriers identified. Follow-up visits were conducted to measure progress. Results Thirty-three hypertensive patients with or without diabetes were included in the study. The pharmacists, in partnership with the CHWs, offered 149 interventions related to medication adherence barriers. The most commonly identified barriers included forgetfulness, adverse effects, and knowledge concerns. By the final visits, 75.6% of the barriers related to antihypertensive medications and 63.9% of the barriers related to antidiabetic medications were resolved. In addition, a paired t test indicated a significant difference in the mean blood pressure values (P = 0.006 for systolic and P = 0.008 for diastolic) recorded at the initial (mean = 136/85.7 mm Hg) and final (mean = 130.1/81.2 mm Hg) visits. Conclusion The findings of this pilot project support the collaboration between pharmacists and CHWs to help improve medication adherence and patient outcomes. Additional research is recommended to validate these study findings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Health coaches demonstrated potential in increasing technology use in diabetes management (eg, telehealth or continuous glucose monitoring).
“Health coaches demonstrated potential in increasing technology use in diabetes management (eg, telehealth or, more recently, continuous glucose monitoring60,61).”
From Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2023) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Kangovi, S., Mitra, N., Grande, D., White, M. L., McCollum, S., Sellman, J., Shannon, R. P., & Long, J. A. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14327 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Allen, J. K., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C. R., Szanton, S. L., Bone, L., Hill, M. N., Levine, D. M., West, M., Barlow, A., Lewis-Boyer, L., Donnelly-Strozzo, M., et al. (2011) · Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · doi:10.1161/circoutcomes.111.961573 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Sharp, L. K., Tilton, J. J., Touchette, D. R., Xia, Y., Mihailescu, D., Berbaum, M. L., & Gerber, B. S. (2018) · Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2058 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mobile Health Intervention in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Gerber, B. S., Biggers, A., Tilton, J. J., Smith Marsh, D. E., Lane, R., Mihailescu, D., Lee, J., & Sharp, L. K. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.33629 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wheat, L., Roane, T. E., Connelly, A., Zeigler, M., Wallace, J., Kim, J.-H., & Segal, R.
- Corresponding author
- Roane, Teresa E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-11
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1009-1014
- ISSN
- 1544-3191 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3049256560
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Keywords
- medication adherence, community health workers, hypertension, antihypertensive drugs, antidiabetic drugs, barriers to medication adherence, medication therapy management, blood pressure control, Native American patients, Black patients, minority groups, patient education
- MeSH terms
- Antihypertensive Agents, Community Health Workers, Humans, Pharmacists, Pilot Projects, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review