Cited by 10Diversity and Career in MedicineWorkplace Violence and BullyingDiscrimination and Equality Law

An intersectional review of discrimination and harassment experiences in pharmacy: Findings from the 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey

Bakken, Brianne K., Gaither, Caroline A., Doucette, William R., Witry, Matthew J., Kreling, David H., Schommer, Jon C., Arya, Vibhuti, Mott, David A.·2021·Journal of the American Pharmacists Association

Abstract

Background Most pharmacists in the United States are women, and the profession is becoming more racially diverse. The recent increase in political and social movements in the United States has heightened our awareness of the importance of better understanding the experiences of underrepresented individuals and groups. Little is known about discrimination and harassment in the profession of pharmacy in the United States.Objectives The purpose of this study was to provide evidence that discrimination and harassment exist in the pharmacy profession and explore differences in discrimination and harassment using the intersectionality of race and sex.Methods The 2019 National Pharmacist Workforce Survey (NPWS) utilized an electronic survey that was distributed using a 3-contact Dillman approach by email to a randomized sample of 96,110 licensed pharmacists from all 50 U.S. states using the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy Foundation e-profile system. The 2019 NPWS included a new battery of questions to assess the prevalence of discrimination and harassment in pharmacy.Results The most common bases of discrimination experienced were based on age (31.2%), sex (29%), and race or ethnicity (16.6%). The most common type of harassment experienced was "hearing demeaning comments related to race or ethnicity" at 15.6%. The intersectionality analysis revealed different experiences among sex or race combinations. Black and Asian male pharmacists had the highest rate of "hearing demeaning comments about race or ethnicity." Nonwhite pharmacists were more likely to experience harassment from customers or patients compared with their white colleagues. Black female pharmacists had the highest rate of being "very unsatisfied" with the results of reporting discrimination and harassment to their employer.Conclusion Discrimination, including harassment and sexual harassment, is illegal, immoral, and unjust. As the profession of pharmacy continues to become more diverse, there must be a conscious, systemic, and sustained effort to create and maintain workplaces that are safe, equitable, and free of discrimination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.japh.2021.04.002

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakken, B. K., Gaither, C. A., Doucette, W. R., Witry, M. J., Kreling, D. H., Schommer, J. C., Arya, V., & Mott, D. A.
Corresponding author
Bakken, Brianne K.
Venue
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
61
Issue
5
Pages
522-532
ISSN
1544-3191 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152828559
Cited by
10
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
Keywords
workplace harassment, sexual harassment, intersectionality, race and sex, pharmacists, underrepresented groups, workplace equity
MeSH terms
Workforce, Female, Humans, Male, Pharmacies, Pharmacists, Pharmacy, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Sexual Harassment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review