The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement
Open accessAbstract
Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is gaining distinct advantage in manufacturing industries because of its ability to manufacture parts with complex shapes without any tooling requirement and human interface. The properties of FDM built parts exhibit high dependence on process parameters and can be improved by setting parameters at suitable levels. Anisotropic and brittle nature of build part makes it important to study the effect of process parameters to the resistance to compressive loading for enhancing service life of functional parts. Hence, the present work focuses on extensive study to understand the effect of five important parameters such as layer thickness, part build orientation, raster angle, raster width and air gap on the compressive stress of test specimen. The study not only provides insight into complex dependency of compressive stress on process parameters but also develops a statistically validated predictive equation. The equation is used to find optimal parameter setting through quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO). As FDM process is a highly complex one and process parameters influence the responses in a non linear manner, compressive stress is predicted using artificial neural network (ANN) and is compared with predictive equation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rochus, P., Plesseria, J.-Y., Van Elsen, M., Kruth, J.-P., Carrus, R., & Dormal, T. (2007) · Acta Astronautica · doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.01.004 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Additive manufacturing methods and modelling approaches: a critical review
Bikas, H., Stavropoulos, P., & Chryssolouris, G. (2016) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7576-2 · Cited by 1,427
Qi, X., Chen, G., Li, Y., Cheng, X., & Li, C. (2019) · Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.eng.2019.04.012 · Cited by 529
Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing
Qin, J., Hu, F., Liu, Y., Witherell, P., Wang, C. C. L., Rosen, D. W., Simpson, T. W., Lu, Y., & Tang, Q. (2022) · Additive Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2022.102691 · Cited by 391
Machine learning in predicting mechanical behavior of additively manufactured parts
Nasiri, S., & Khosravani, M. R. (2021) · Journal of Materials Research and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.004 · Cited by 202
A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction
Azami, M., Kazemi, Z., Moazen, S., Dubé, M., Potvin, M.-J., & Skonieczny, K. (2024) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101045 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-90
- ISSN
- 2090-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-1232
- OpenAlex
- W2093500299
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001
- The paper
- Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. S. (2012). Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. Journal of Advanced Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.