Multiple-choice testing as a desirable difficulty in the classroom.
Abstract
Abstract We examined whether the power of tests as learning events, frequently demonstrated in the laboratory, would also occur in a large undergraduate course. Our goals were to determine: if learning of information tested on multiple-choice quizzes administered across the course would be enhanced compared to non-tested control information; and what the effects of quizzing would be for the learning of information conceptually related to the tested information but not itself tested on the quizzes. Given that retrieval practice can have positive ( testing effect ) and negative consequences ( retrieval-induced forgetting ), our concern was that the learning and later retention of non-tested conceptually related information might be impaired by the multiple-choice quizzes. Importantly, learning benefits were found for both types of information on the final exam, indicating that quizzing within a course can enhance not only the learning of specifically tested information, but the learning of non-tested conceptually related information as well.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bjork et al. (2014) demonstrated that the benefits extended not just to the actual information tested but also to related information.
“Bjork et al. (2014) demonstrated that the benefits extended not just to the actual information tested but also to related information.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Bjork et al. 2014
Similar benefits of in-class quizzes in college classes have been seen in a Psychology Research Methods class, an Introductory Psychology class, and a Statistics for Psychology class at large state universities.
“Similar benefits of in-class quizzes in college classes have been seen in a Psychology Research Methods class (Bjork et al. 2014), in an Introductory Psychology class (Batsell et al. 2017), and in a Statistics for Psychology class (Lyle & Crawford 2011), all of them at large state universities.”
From Practicing Retrieval Facilitates Learning (2021) · cites this paper as Bjork et al. 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 75
- Authors
- Bjork, E. L., Little, J. L., & Storm, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
- Published
- 2014-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-170
- ISSN
- 2211-3681 (ISSN-L)
- 2211-369X
- OpenAlex
- W1998841523
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
- Keywords
- multiple-choice quizzes, desirable difficulties, retrieval practice, testing effect, retrieval-induced forgetting, conceptual relatedness, retention, undergraduate courses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review