CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 297

Distinguishing between archaeological sheep and goat bones using a single collagen peptide

Buckley, Mike, Whitcher Kansa, Sarah, Howard, Sarah, Campbell, Stuart, Thomas-Oates, Jane, Collins, Matthew·2010·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZooMS analysis has been developed and used to identify sheep and goat remains based on mass differences in collagen peptides between these two taxa.

    “For example, ZooMS analysis has been developed and used to identify sheep and goat remains based on mass differences in collagen peptides between these two taxa (89).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Balasse, 2005, Distinguishing sheep and goats using dental morphology and stable carbon isotopes in C4 grassland environments, Journal of Archaeological Science, 32, 691, 10.1016/j.jas.2004.11.013 · DOI
  2. Bar-Gal, 2003, The application of ancient DNA analysis to identify neolithic Caprinae: a case study from the site of Hatoula, Israel, International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 13, 120, 10.1002/oa.666 · DOI
  3. Boessneck, 1964, Osteologische unterscheidungsmerkmale zwischen schaf (Ovis aries Linne) and ziege (Capra hircus Linne), Kuhn Archives, 78, 1
  4. Buckley, 2008, A method of isolating the collagen (I) α2 chain carboxytelopeptide for species identification in bone fragments, Analytical Biochemistry, 374, 325, 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
  5. Buckley, 2008, Comparing the survival of osteocalcin and mtDNA in archaeological bone from four European sites, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 1756, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.11.022 · DOI
  6. Buckley, 2008, Comment on “protein sequences from mastodon and tyrannosaurus rex revealed by mass spectrometry”, Science, 319, 33c, 10.1126/science.1147046 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Campbell, 1999, Emerging complexity on the Kahramanmaras plain, Turkey: the Domuztepe project, 1995–1997, American Journal of Archaeology, 103, 395, 10.2307/506968 · DOI
  8. Clutton-Brock, 1979, The mammalian remains from the Jericho Tell, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 45, 135, 10.1017/S0079497X00009713 · DOI
  9. Davis, 1985, A preliminary report of the fauna from Hatoula: a Natufian Khiamian (PPNA) site near Latroun, Israel, vol. 1, 71
  10. Dobberstein, 2009, Archaeological collagen: why worry about collagen diagenesis?, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 1, 31, 10.1007/s12520-009-0002-7 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Grine, 1987, Analysis of individual, intraspecific and interspecific variability in quantitative parameters of caprine tooth enamel structure, Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 45, 1, 10.3109/00016358709094349 · DOI
  12. Haile, 2007, Ancient DNA chronology within sediment deposits: are paleobiological reconstructions possible and is DNA leaching a factor?, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 982, 10.1093/molbev/msm016 · DOI
  13. Halstead, 2002, Sorting the sheep from the goats: morphological distinctions between the mandibles and mandibular teeth of adult Ovis and Capra, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29, 545, 10.1006/jasc.2001.0777 · DOI
  14. Kansa, S.W., in preparation. Domuztepe mammal remains. In: Campbell, S., Carter, E., (Eds.), Prehistoric Domuztepe, vol. 1. Monumenta Archaeologica.
  15. Lalueza-Fox, 2005, Molecular dating of caprines using ancient DNA sequences of Myotragus balearicus, an extinct endemic Balearic mammal, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 5
  16. Leonard, 2007, Animal DNA in PCR reagents plagues ancient DNA research, Journal of Archaeological Science, 34, 1361, 10.1016/j.jas.2006.10.023 · DOI
  17. Loreille, 1997, First distinction of sheep and goat archaeological bones by the means of their fossil mtDNA, Journal of Archaeological Science, 24, 33, 10.1006/jasc.1995.0094 · DOI
  18. Munson, 2000, Age-correlated differential destruction of bones and its effect on archaeological mortality profiles of domestic sheep and goats, Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 391, 10.1006/jasc.1999.0463 · DOI
  19. Newman, 2002, Identification of archaeological animal bone by PCR/DNA analysis, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29, 77, 10.1006/jasc.2001.0688 · DOI
  20. Payne, 1973, Kill-off patterns in sheep and goats: the mandibles from Asvan Kale, Anatolian Studies, 23, 281, 10.2307/3642547 · DOI
  21. Payne, 1985, Morphological distinctions between the mandibular teeth of young sheep, Ovis and goats, Capra, Journal of Archaeological Science, 12, 139, 10.1016/0305-4403(85)90058-5 · DOI
  22. Pearson, 2007, New light on early caprine herding from isotope analysis: a case study from Neolithic Anatolia, Journal of Archeological Science, 34, 2170, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.09.001 · DOI
  23. Ropiquet, 2005, Molecular evidence for the polyphyly of the genus Hemitragus (Mammalia, Bovidae), Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 36, 154, 10.1016/j.ympev.2005.01.002 · DOI
  24. Smith, 2003, The thermal history of human fossils and the likelihood of successful DNA amplification, Journal of Human Evolution, 45, 203, 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00106-4 · DOI
  25. Willerslev, 2005, Ancient DNA, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 3, 10.1098/rspb.2004.2813 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Zeder, 2000, The initial domestication of goats (Capra hircus) in the Zagros Mountains 10,000 years ago, Science, 287, 2254, 10.1126/science.287.5461.2254 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckley, M., Whitcher Kansa, S., Howard, S., Campbell, S., Thomas-Oates, J., & Collins, M.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
13-20
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020
Cited by
297
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review