The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Who provided maize to Chaco Canyon after the mid-12th-century drought?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Archaeologists have also used 87Sr/86Sr data to infer the geologic zone in which a plant or animal lived (29–32).”
From Feasting and the evolution of cooperative social organizations circa 2300 B.P. in Paracas culture, southern Peru (2018) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Benson, 2009, Climate change and cultural response in the American Southwest, Kiva, 75, 89, 10.1179/kiv.2009.75.1.005 · DOI
- Benson, 2003, Ancient maize from Chacoan great houses: where was it grown?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 13111, 10.1073/pnas.2135068100 · DOI
- Benson, 2007, Anasazi (pre-Columbian Native-American) migrations during the middle-12th and late-13th centuries – were they drought induced?, Climatic Change, 83, 187, 10.1007/s10584-006-9065-y · DOI
- Benson, 2008, Development and evaluation of geochemical methods for the sourcing of archaeological maize, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 912, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.06.018 · DOI
- Benson, 2009, Possible sources of archaeological maize found in Chaco Canyon and Aztec Ruin, New Mexico, Journal of Archaeological Science, 36, 387, 10.1016/j.jas.2008.09.023 · DOI
- Benson, 2010, The cleaning of burned and contaminated archaeological maize prior to 87Sr/86Sr analysis, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 84, 10.1016/j.jas.2009.09.005 · DOI
- Cameron, 2008, History and process in village formation: context and contrasts from the northern Southwest, American Antiquity, 73, 29, 10.1017/S0002731600041275 · DOI
- Cordell, 2008, Archaeological corn from Pueblo Bonito, Chaco Canyon, New Mexico: dates, contexts, sources, American Antiquity, 73, 491, 10.1017/S0002731600046837 · DOI
- English, 2001, Strontium isotopes reveal distant sources of architectural timber in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 11891, 10.1073/pnas.211305498 · DOI · Paper page
- Homburg, 2005, Anthropogenic influences on Zuni agricultural soils, Geoarchaeology, 20, 661, 10.1002/gea.20076 · DOI
- Kintigh, 2004, Long-term settlement history and the emergence of towns in the Zuni area, American Antiquity, 69, 432, 10.2307/4128401 · DOI
- Reed, 2006, Salmon Pueblo: Chacoan outlier and 13th-century middle San Juan community center, vol. 1, 367
- Varien, 2007, Historical ecology in the Mesa Verde region: results from the Village Ecodynamics Project, American Antiquity, 72, 273, 10.2307/40035814 · DOI
- Vivian, 1965, Kin Kletso, a Pueblo III Community in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, vol. 8
- Wilshusen, 1999, Rethinking the Pueblo I period in the San Juan drainage: aggregation, migration, and cultural diversity, Kiva, 64, 369, 10.1080/00231940.1999.11758389 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stanish, C., Tantaleán, H., & Knudson, K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1806632115 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Benson, L. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Archaeological Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 621-629
- ISSN
- 0305-4403
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review