Cited by 142

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strontium isotopes reveal distant sources of architectural timber in Chaco Canyon, New Mexico

English, Nathan B., Betancourt, Julio L., Dean, Jeffrey S., Quade, Jay·2001·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Between A.D. 900 and 1150, more than 200,000 conifer trees were used to build the prehistoric great houses of Chaco Canyon, New Mexico, in what is now a treeless landscape. More than one-fifth of these timbers were spruce ( Picea ) or fir ( Abies ) that were hand-carried from isolated mountaintops 75–100 km away. Because strontium from local dust, water, and underlying bedrock is incorporated by trees, specific logging sites can be identified by comparing 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios in construction beams from different ruins and building periods to ratios in living trees from the surrounding mountains. 87 Sr/ 86 Sr ratios show that the beams came from both the Chuska and San Mateo (Mount Taylor) mountains, but not from the San Pedro Mountains, which are equally close. Incorporation of logs from two sources in the same room, great house, and year suggest stockpiling and intercommunity collaboration at Chaco Canyon. The use of trees from both the Chuska and San Mateo mountains, but not from the San Pedro Mountains, as early as A.D. 974 suggests that selection of timber sources was driven more by regional socioeconomic ties than by a simple model of resource depletion with distance and time.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.211305498

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Substantial evidence indicates that timber resources were extracted from the southern Chuska Mountains of the Defiance Plateau around A.D. 1030-1100.

    “Substantial evidence (Betancourt, Dean & Hull 1986; English et al. 2001; Guiterman, Swetnam & Dean 2016; Reynolds et al. 2005) indicates that timber resources were extracted from the southern Chuska Mountains of the Defiance Plateau around A.D. 1030–1100.”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as English et al. 2001

  • The North Road and Mexican Springs Road were selected because of their close proximity to timber resource locations that would have been increasingly accessed in the eleventh and twelfth centuries A.D.

    “In this case, we selected the North Road and the Mexican Springs Road as the basis for our corridors, because of their close proximity to timber resource locations that would have been increasingly accessed in the eleventh and twelfth centuries A.D. (Betancourt, Dean & Hull 1986; English et al. 2001; Guiterman, Swetnam & Dean 2016; Reynolds et al. 2005).”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as English et al. 2001

  • Other products like ceramics, or resources like timber, were circulated regionally.

    “while other products like ceramics, or resources like timber, were circulated regionally (e.g., English et al. 2001; Guiterman, Swetnam & Dean 2016; King 2003; Mills, Carpenter & Grimm1997; Shepard 1939; Shepard in Judd 1954: 236–238).”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as English et al. 2001

  • Nearly one-fifth of all beams used in Chaco Canyon must have been carried from distant mountain ranges.

    “thus indicating that nearly one-fifth of all beams used in Chaco Canyon must have been carried from distant mountain ranges (English et al. 2001)”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as English et al. 2001

  • Many timbers were imported into Chaco Canyon from peripheral locations at distances of around 75 kilometers.

    “a growing body of evidence suggests that many timbers were imported into Chaco Canyon from peripheral locations at distances of around 75 kilometers (Betancourt, Dean & Hull 1986; English et al. 2001; Guiterman, Swetnam & Dean 2016; Reynolds et al. 2005; Windes & McKenna 2001).”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as English et al. 2001

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. R G Vivian The Chacoan Prehistory of the San Juan Basin (Academic, New York, 1990).
  2. J S Dean Anasazi Regional Organization in the Chaco System, ed D Doyel (Maxwell Museum of Anthropological Papers No. 5, Albuquerque, NM), pp. 35–43 (1992).
  3. 10.1038/scientificamerican0788-100 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/282427 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.2307/2694321 · DOI
  6. J S Dean, R Warren The Architecture and Dendrochronology of Chetro Ketl, eds S H Lekson, Reports, of the Chaco Center No. 6 (National Park Service, Albuquerque, NM), pp. 105–240. (1983).
  7. 10.1126/science.214.4521.656 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/BF01868379 · DOI
  9. 10.2307/279950 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1006/jasc.1998.0315 · DOI
  11. T M Yanosky, D A Vroblesky Tree Rings as Indicators of Ecosystem Health, ed T E Lewis (CRC, Boca Raton, FL), pp. 177–205 (1995).
  12. 10.1007/978-3-642-65367-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.276.5320.1828 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00379-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0016-7037(96)00052-X · DOI
  16. W C Graustein Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research, eds P W Rundel, J Ehleringer, K A Nagy (Springer, New York), pp. 491–511 (1989). · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.219.4582.289 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/jasc.1999.0504 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00410-5 · DOI
  20. L S Crumpler Albuquerque Country II 33rd Annual Field Conference, eds J A Grambling, S G Wells (New Mexico Geological Society, Albuquerque), pp. 291–298 (1982). · DOI
  21. 10.2307/1938649 · DOI
  22. 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1189:AHEUTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  23. 10.1191/095968300668451235 · DOI
  24. 10.1175/1520-0442(1998)011<3128:MDAERT>2.0.CO;2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
English, N. B., Betancourt, J. L., Dean, J. S., & Quade, J.
Affiliations
School of Renewable Natural Resources, Laboratory of Tree-Ring Research, and Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; and U.S. Geological Survey, Desert Laboratory, Tucson, AZ 85745
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2001-09-25
Volume
98
Issue
21
Pages
11891-11896
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
142
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review