Cited by 48Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Boiled versus unboiled: a study on Neolithic and contemporary human bones

Bosch, Pedro, Alemán, Inmaculada, Moreno-Castilla, Carlos, Botella, Miguel·2011·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2011.04.019

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosch, P., Alemán, I., Moreno-Castilla, C., & Botella, M.
Affiliations
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Corresponding author
Bosch, Pedro
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
38
Issue
10
Pages
2561-2570
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022751726
Cited by
48
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
bone texture, bone mineral composition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review