Cited by 118Maritime and Coastal ArchaeologyGlobal Maritime and Colonial HistoriesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modeling distance with time in ancient Mediterranean seafaring: a GIS application for the interpretation of maritime connectivity

Leidwanger, Justin·2013·Journal of Archaeological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2013.03.016

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 118

Metadata

Authors
Leidwanger, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Leidwanger, Justin
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-08
Volume
40
Issue
8
Pages
3302-3308
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010288036
Cited by
118
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Keywords
maritime connectivity, maritime trade, marine resource exploitation, maritime culture, socio-economic structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review