Cited by 116Language and cultural evolutionArchaeological and Geological StudiesPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

Cultural evolutionary approaches to artifact variation over time and space: Basis, progress, and prospects

Lycett, Stephen J.·2015·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2015.01.004

Cites

140 of 140 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 144 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lycett, S. J.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Lycett, Stephen J.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-04
Volume
56
Pages
21-31
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095230710
Cited by
116
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10
FWCI
188.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
cultural evolution, artifact typology, spatiotemporal variation, archaeological record

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review