CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prehistoric individual, connoisseurship and archaeological science: The Muisca goldwork of Colombia

Martinón-Torres, Marcos, Uribe-Villegas, María Alicia·2015·Journal of Archaeological Science
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.014
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The limited integration of hierarchical settlement systems in the northeastern Andes of Colombia did not hinder the production of technologies required for goldworking, the planning and building of structural earthworks for water control, or textile production.

    “The limited integration of hierarchical settlement systems in the northeastern Andes of Colombia did not hinder the production of technologies required for goldworking (Martinón-Torres and Uribe-Villegas, 2015), the planning and building structural earthworks for water control (Boada, 2018), or textile production (Tavera and Urbina, 1994).”

    From Sociopolitical evolution, population clustering, and technology among early sedentary communities in northeastern andes, colombia (2024) · cites this paper as Martinón-Torres and Uribe-Villegas, 2015

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ainsworth, 2005, From Connoisseurship to technical history: the evolution of the interdisciplinary study of art, Getty Conserv. Newsl., 20, 4
  2. Baxter, 2006, Log-ratio compositional data analysis in archaeometry, Archaeometry, 48, 511, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2006.00270.x · DOI
  3. Bayard, 1978, Review of ‘The Individual in Prehistory: Studies in Variability in Style in Prehistoric Technologies’, 13(4), 679
  4. Bevan, 2014, Computer vision, archaeological classification and China's terracotta warriors, J. Archaeol. Sci., 49, 249, 10.1016/j.jas.2014.05.014 · DOI
  5. Blackman, 1993, The standardization hypothesis and ceramic mass production: technological, compositional, and metric indexes of craft specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria, Am. Antiq., 58, 60, 10.2307/281454 · DOI
  6. Cahen, 1979, Stone tools, toolkits, and human behavior in prehistory, Curr. Anthropol., 20, 661, 10.1086/202371 · DOI
  7. Carrier, 2003, In praise of connoisseurship, J. Aesthet. Art Crit., 61, 159, 10.1111/1540-6245.00103 · DOI
  8. Crown, 2007, Life histories of pots and potters: situating the individual in archaeology, Am. Antiq., 72, 677, 10.2307/25470440 · DOI
  9. Goren, 2011, Nondestructive provenance study of cuneiform tablets using portable X-ray fluorescence (pXRF), J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 684, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.020 · DOI
  10. Kaplan, 1980, Review of ‘The Individual in Prehistory: Studies in Variability in Style in Prehistoric Technologies’, 82(2), 418
  11. Knapp, 2008, Past practices: rethinking individuals and agents in archaeology, Camb. Archaeol. J., 18, 15, 10.1017/S0959774308000024 · DOI
  12. Kovacs, 2009, Characterization of calibration materials for trace element analysis and fingerprint studies of gold using LA-ICP-MS, J. Anal. Atomic Spectrom., 24, 476, 10.1039/b819685k · DOI
  13. Langebaek, 1987, Persistencia de prácticas de orfebrería Muisca en el siglo XVI: el caso de Lenguazaque, Univ. Humanist., 16, 45
  14. Langebaek, 2005, Fiestas y caciques muiscas en El Infiernito, Colombia: un análisis de la relación entre festejos y organización política, Bol. Arqueol. PUCP, 9, 281, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.200501.011 · DOI
  15. Langebaek, 2011, Condiciones de vida y jerarquías sociales en el norte de Suramerica: el caso de la población muisca en Tibanica, Soacha, Indiana, 28, 15
  16. Li, 2014, Crossbows and imperial craft organisation: the bronze triggers of China's Terracotta Army, Antiquity, 88, 126, 10.1017/S0003598X00050262 · DOI
  17. Lleras Pérez, 1999, Prehispanic Metallurgy and Votive Offerings in the Eastern Cordillera Colombia, BAR International Series, vol. 778
  18. Londoño, 1989, Santuarios, santillos, tunjos: objetos votivos de los muiscas en el siglo XVI, Bol. Mus. del Oro, 25, 93
  19. Marcus, 2015, Studying the individual in Prehistory: a tale of three women from Cerro Azul, Peru, Ñawpa Pacha, 35, 1, 10.1179/0077629715Z.00000000022 · DOI
  20. Martinón-Torres, 2014, Forty thousand arms for a single emperor: from chemical data to the labor organization behind the bronze arrows of the Terracotta Army, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 21, 534, 10.1007/s10816-012-9158-z · DOI
  21. Martinón-Torres, 2015, Technology and culture in the invention of lost-wax casting in South America: an archaeometric and ethnoarchaeological perspective, Camb. Archaeol. J., 25, 377, 10.1017/S0959774314001164 · DOI
  22. Martinón-Torres, 2012, Metallic encounters in Cuba: the technology, exchange and meaning of metals before and after Columbus, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 31, 439, 10.1016/j.jaa.2012.03.006 · DOI
  23. Morris, 1993, Hands up for the individual! the role of attribution studies in Aegean prehistory, Camb. Archaeol. J., 3, 41, 10.1017/S0959774300000718 · DOI
  24. Mugnaini, 2014, Casting cores used to craft large bronze masterpieces of the Florentine Renaissance and Mannerism, J. Archaeol. Sci., 47, 85, 10.1016/j.jas.2014.04.010 · DOI
  25. Olivier, 1967, 2, 71
  26. Opperman, 1990, The thinking eye, the mind that sees: the art historian as connoisseur, Artibus Hist., 11, 9, 10.2307/1483380 · DOI
  27. Pigeot, 1990, Technical and social actors. Flintknapping specialists and apprentices at Magdalenian Etiolles, Archaeol. Rev. Camb., 9, 126
  28. Rehren, 1999, Cupel and crucible: the refining of debased silver in the Colonia Ulpia Traiana, Xanten, J. Roman Archaeol., 12, 263, 10.1017/S104775940001802X · DOI
  29. Reichel-Dolmatoff, 1978, Desana animal categories, food restrictions, and the concept of color energies, J. Lat. Am. Lore, 4, 243
  30. Saunders, 2011, Shimmering worlds: brilliance, power, and gold in pre-Columbian Panama, 78
  31. Schalm, 2007, Composition of 12–18th century window glass in Belgium: non-figurative windows in secular buildings and stained-glass windows in religious buildings, Spectrochim. Acta Part B, 62, 663, 10.1016/j.sab.2007.03.006 · DOI
  32. Thomas, 2009, Revisiting the individual in prehistory: idiosyncratic engraving variation and the Neolithic slate plaques of the Iberian Peninsula, Camb. Archaeol. J., 19, 53, 10.1017/S0959774309000031 · DOI
  33. Uribe-Villegas, 2012, Composition, colour and context in Muisca votive metalwork (Colombia, AD 600–1800), Antiquity, 86, 772, 10.1017/S0003598X00047918 · DOI
  34. Uribe-Villegas, 2012, Typology, technology, composition and context of Muisca metalwork (Colombia, AD 600–1800): a database, J. Open Archaeol. Data, 1
  35. Van Keuren, 1999, Ceramic Design Structure and the Organization of Cibola White Ware Production in the Grasshopper Region, Arizona, vol. 191, 86
  36. Watts, 2013, Traces of the Individual in Prehistory: Flintknappers and the distribution of projectile points in the eastern Tonto Basin, Arizona, Adv. Archaeol. Pract., 1, 25, 10.7183/2326-3768.1.1.25 · DOI
  37. Whittaker, 1987, Individual variation as an approach to economic organization: projectile points at grasshopper pueblo, Arizona, J. Field Archaeol., 14, 465, 10.1179/jfa.1987.14.4.465 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martinón-Torres, M., & Uribe-Villegas, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
63
Pages
136-155
ISSN
0305-4403
DOI
10.1016/j.jas.2015.08.014
Cited by
33
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
British Academy (SG-54242)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review