Cited by 12Archaeological Research and ProtectionArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Geospatial landscape permeability modeling for archaeology: A case study of food storage in northern Michigan

Open access
Howey, Meghan C.L.·2015·Journal of Archaeological Science

Abstract

As archaeologists continue to be interested in understanding how people encountered and engaged with past landscapes, layering them with social knowledge, it is important to harness geospatial techniques that are not tethered analytically to discrete points and can represent the flow of processes across a whole landscape. This paper explores landscape permeability modeling as one such geospatial approach. Applied archaeologically, permeability modeling examines the degree to which a given landscape, with a specific mix of physical and social variables, was conducive to the movement of people and the flow of social, economic, political, and/or ideological processes. An archaeological case study is presented that uses a resistant-kernel permeability model to examine food storage suitability in an inland lake landscape in northern Michigan during Late Precontact (ca. AD 1100/1200 – 1600) and how people in their intimate, day-to-day, encounters with this landscape understood the storage potential(s) of this matrix. While a specific case is detailed in this paper, the procedures employed are adaptable to other archaeological landscapes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2015.10.007

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Dunham, 2009, Nuts about acorns: a pilot study on acorn use in Woodland period subsistence in the Eastern upper Peninsula of Michigan, Wis. Archeol., 90, 113
  2. Dustin, 1966, Prehistoric storage pits in Saginaw county, Michigan, Mich. Archaeol., 14, 48
  3. Hambacher, 1995, Camp, cache and carry: the Porter creek south site (20MN100) and cache pits at 20MN31 in the Manistee national Forest, Mich. Archaeol., 41, 47
  4. Holman, 2001, Late Woodland storage and mobility in Western lower Michigan, Wis. Archaeol. Pap. Honor Carol I Mason, 2, 7
  5. Lovis, 1978, A case study of construction impacts on archaeological sites in Michigan's inland waterway, J. Field Archaeol., 5, 357
  6. Lovis, 1978, A numerical taxonomic analysis of changing Woodland site location strategies on an Interior Lake chain, Mich. Acad., 11, 39
  7. Schneider, 1942, Report of cleaning out a cache pit, Totem Pole, 10, 5
  8. Schumacher, 1918, Indian remains in door county, Wis. Archeol., 16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howey, M. C. L.
Affiliations
University of New Hampshire (US)
Corresponding author
Howey, Meghan C.L.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
64
Pages
88-99
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1878395690
Cited by
12
References
53
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (acceptedVersion)
  • University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Science Foundation (#0851096;)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
food storage, Late Precontact period, northern Michigan, human movement, landscape use, Great Lakes region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review