The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging
Open accessAbstract
Common organic matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) matrices, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid, 3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, and alpha-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid, were found to undergo sublimation without decomposition under conditions of reduced pressure and elevated temperature. This solid to vapor-phase transition was exploited to apply MALDI matrix onto tissue samples over a broad surface in a solvent-free application for mass spectrometric imaging. Sublimation of matrix produced an even layer of small crystals across the sample plate. The deposition was readily controlled with time, temperature, and pressure settings and was highly reproducible from one sample to the next. Mass spectrometric images acquired from phospholipid standards robotically spotted onto a MALDI plate yielded a more intense, even signal with fewer sodium adducts when matrix was applied by sublimation relative to samples where matrix was deposited by an electrospray technique. MALDI matrix could be readily applied to tissue sections on glass slides and stainless steel MALDI plate inserts as long as good thermal contact was made with the condenser of the sublimation device. Sections of mouse brain were coated with matrix applied by sublimation and were imaged using a Q-q-TOF mass spectrometer to yield mass spectral images of very high quality. Image quality is likely enhanced by several features of this technique including the microcrystalline morphology of the deposited matrix, increased purity of deposited matrix, and evenness of deposition. This inexpensive method was reproducible and eliminated the potential for spreading of analytes arising from solvent deposition during matrix application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kompauer, M., Heiles, S., & Spengler, B. (2017) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.4071 · Cited by 600
Advanced MALDI mass spectrometry imaging in pharmaceutical research and drug development
Schulz, S., Becker, M., Groseclose, M. R., Schadt, S., & Hopf, C. (2019) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2018.08.003 · Cited by 325
Ullman, J. C., Arguello, A., Getz, J. A., Bhalla, A., Mahon, C. S., Wang, J., Giese, T., Bedard, C., Kim, D. J., Blumenfeld, J. R., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aay1163 · Cited by 205
MALDI imaging mass spectrometry of human tissue: method challenges and clinical perspectives
Seeley, E. H., & Caprioli, R. M. (2011) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.12.002 · Cited by 197
Körber, A., Anthony, I. G. M., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2025) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05249 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M., & Murphy, R. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1646-1652
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053190232
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.010
- The paper
- Hankin, J. A., Barkley, R. M., & Murphy, R. C. (2007). Sublimation as a method of matrix application for mass spectrometric imaging. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.06.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.