The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Full scan MS in comprehensive qualitative and quantitative residue analysis in food and feed matrices: How much resolving power is required?
Open accessAbstract
In LC full scan based MS screening methods correct mass assignment is essential. Parameters affecting the accuracy of mass assignment, i.e., analyte concentration, complexity of the matrix, and resolving power, were studied using typical examples from the field of residue and contaminant analysis in food and feed. The evaluation was carried out by analyzing samples of honey and animal feed, spiked with 151 pesticides, veterinary drugs, mycotoxins, and plant toxins at levels ranging from 10 to 250 ng/g. Analyses were performed using a single stage Orbitrap with resolving power settings varying from 10,000 to 100,000 (FWHM). For consistent and reliable mass assignment (<2 ppm) of analytes at low levels in complex matrices, a high resolving power (≥50,000) was found to be required. At lower resolving power settings, the error in the assignment of mass increased due to the coelution of analytes with interferences at the same nominal mass. This negatively affected selectivity and quantitative performance due to the inability to use the required narrow mass-extraction windows. In the case of the less complex honey matrix, a resolving power of 25,000 was generally sufficient to obtain a mass assignment error close to the typical instrument mass accuracy (≤2 ppm) down to low concentration levels of 10 ng/g.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Krauss, M., Singer, H., & Hollender, J. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3608-9 · Cited by 743
Identification of Novel Fluorochemicals in Aqueous Film-Forming Foams Used by the US Military
Place, B. J., & Field, J. A. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es301465n · Cited by 543
Lu, W., Clasquin, M. F., Melamud, E., Amador-Noguez, D., Caudy, A. A., & Rabinowitz, J. D. (2010) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac902837x · Cited by 502
High Resolution Mass Spectrometry
Xian, F., Hendrickson, C. L., & Marshall, A. G. (2012) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac203191t · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Kellmann, M., Muenster, H., Zomer, P., & Mol, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2009-05-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1464-1476
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2099769025
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 37.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Full scan MS in comprehensive qualitative and quantitative residue analysis in food and feed matrices: How much resolving power is required? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.05.010
- The paper
- Kellmann, M., Muenster, H., Zomer, P., & Mol, H. (2009). Full scan MS in comprehensive qualitative and quantitative residue analysis in food and feed matrices: How much resolving power is required? Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2009.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.