CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evaluation of trade and interaction between Chaco Canyon and Chaco outlier sites in the American Southwest by investigating trachybasalt temper in pottery sherds

Arakawa, Fumiyasu, Gonzales, David, McMillan, Nancy, Murphy, Molly·2016·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.01.035
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.01.035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Temper materials were specifically gathered from the most efficiently accessible locations.

    “In some cases even, temper materials were specifically gathered from the most efficiently accessible locations (Arakawa et al. 2016).”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as Arakawa et al. 2016

  • In some cases, temper materials were specifically gathered from the most efficiently accessible locations.

    “In some cases even, temper materials were specifically gathered from the most efficiently accessible locations (Arakawa et al. 2016).”

    From A least cost analysis: correlative modeling of the chaco regional road system (2019) · cites this paper as Arakawa et al. 2016

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Arakawa, 2015, Chapter 6. Artifacts, edited by Susan Ryan, 120
  2. Arakawa, 2009, Geoarchaeological investigation of lithic resources in the Central Mesa Verde Region, Colorado, USA, Geoarchaeology, 24, 204, 10.1002/gea.20263 · DOI
  3. Gonzales, 2015, Petrographic and Geochemical Constraints on the Provenance of Sanidine-Bearing Temper in Ceramic Potsherds, Four Corners Region, Southwest USA, Geoarchaeology, 30, 59, 10.1002/gea.21496 · DOI
  4. Irwin-Williams, 1972, The Structure of Chacoan Society in the Northern Southwest: investigations at the Salmon Site, 1972, Eastern New Mexico University Contributions in Anthropology, 4, 1
  5. Lipe, 2000, Spatial Patterning in Northern San Juan Villages, A.D. 1050–1300., Kiva, 66, 91, 10.1080/00231940.2000.11758423 · DOI
  6. McMillan, 2012, Correlation of limestone beds using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and chemometric analysis, Appl. Opt., 51, 213, 10.1364/AO.51.00B213 · DOI
  7. McMillan, N.J., S. Rees, K. Kochelek, and C. McManus, 2014. Geologic applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, v. 38, p. 329–343. · DOI
  8. Mills, 1997, Sourcing Chuskan ceramic production: petrographic and experimental analyses, Kiva, 62, 261, 10.1080/00231940.1997.11758335 · DOI
  9. Multari, R.A., D.A. Cremers, J.M. Dupre, and J.E. Gustafson, 2010. The use of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for distinguishing between bacterial pathogen species and strains: Appl. Spectrosc., v. 64, p. 750–759. · DOI
  10. Toll, 2001, Making and breaking pots in the Chaco World, Am. Antiq., 66, 56, 10.2307/2694318 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arakawa, F., Gonzales, D., McMillan, N., & Murphy, M.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
6
Pages
115-124
ISSN
2352-409X
DOI
10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.01.035
Cited by
1
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Discovery Pool Grant by the Canyonlands Natural Historical Association
  • Fort Lewis College Faculty Development Grant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review