Cited by 3Soil and Environmental StudiesAncient Mediterranean Archaeology and HistoryCultural Heritage Materials Analysis

Tephrochronology and micromorphology of Theran tephra deposits at Palaikastro, Crete

Kulick, Rachel, Westgate, John·2021·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2021.102884

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Kulick, R., & Westgate, J.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Kulick, Rachel
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
36
Pages
102884
ISSN
2352-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3134758399
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Bristol
  • Council of American Overseas Research Centers
  • University of Toronto
  • Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • British School at Athens
  • University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
Keywords
Santorini, tephra deposits, Palaikastro, tephrochronology, soil micromorphology, settlement abandonment, Bronze Age Crete

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review