Cited by 21Archaeological Research and ProtectionRemote Sensing and Land UseGeophysical Methods and Applications

Google Earth Engine for archaeologists: An updated look at the progress and promise of remotely sensed big data

Open access
Herndon, Kelsey E., Griffin, Robert, Schroder, Whittaker, Murtha, Timothy, Golden, Charles, Contreras, Daniel A., Cherrington, Emil, Wang, Luwei +3 more·2023·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Abstract

A wealth of remotely sensed data has accumulated over the past several decades and now constitutes an analytical resource primed for archaeological applications. To date, remotely sensed big data (RSBD) analytics in archaeology have focused on filling spatial gaps in the distribution of sites and features, characterizing environmental landscapes, and monitoring cultural heritage sites. The scientific promise of these data to expand our understanding of past human-environment interactions has not been fully realized. Limitations of data access, sufficient analytical and computational resources, and methodological awareness and education on the appropriate use of RSBD have limited the adoption and widespread use of RSBD in archaeology, despite its ubiquity in the Earth sciences. Google Earth Engine (GEE) is a freely available planetary-scale cloud computing platform that addresses the perennial challenges of data access, analysis, and computing power that are particularly acute among archaeologists aiming to derive insights from RSBD. GEE lowers the barrier to entry for analyzing RSBD, expanding the potential for these data in the automated identification of archaeological features through deep learning; fieldwork planning and archaeological practice; modeling of past environments and environmental variability; and cultural heritage impact and risk assessments. In doing so, it also contributes to open science via increased access, transparency, and reproducibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2023.104094

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Casana, 2014, Regional-Scale Archaeological Remote Sensing in the Age of Big Data: Automated Site Discovery vs. Brute Force Methods. Advances in Archaeological, Practice, 2, 222
  2. Golden, 2016, Reanalyzing environmental lidar data for archaeology: Mesoamerican applications and implications, Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, Volume 9, October 2016, ISSN, 293–308, 2352
  3. Gutiérrez, G. and M.T. Searcy. (2016). Introduction to the UAV Special Edition. Advances in Archaeological Practice. 16(2).
  4. Hörr, 2014, Machine Learning Based Typology Development in Archaeology. Journal on Computing and Cultural, Heritage, 7
  5. Liss, 2017, Testing Google Earth Engine for the Automatic Identification and Vectorization of Archaeological Features: A Case Study of Faynan, Jordan. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports., 15
  6. Liu, 2021, Remote Sensing-Based Monitoring of Immovable Cultural Relics, from Environmental Factors to the Protected Cultural Site: A Case Study of the Shunji Bridge, Sustainability., 13
  7. Mantellini, 2019, Evaluating the Human Impact on the Archaeological Landscape of Samarkand (Uzbekistan): A Diachronic Assessment of the Taylak District by Remote Sensing, Field Survey, and Local Knowledge. Archaeological Research, Asia, 20, 100143
  8. Marken, 2017, Maya Cities, People and Place: Comparative Perspectives from El Peru and Tikal, In Research Reports in Belizean Archaeology, V14, 177
  9. Olson, 2018, A Beginner’s Guide to Mesoscale Survey with Quadrotor-UAV Systems. Advances in Archaeological, Practice, 6
  10. Opitz, 2018, Recent Trends and Long-standing Problems in Archaeological Remote Sensing. Journal of Computer Applications, Archaeology, 1
  11. Ortman, 2019, A New Kind of Relevance for Archaeology. Frontiers in Digital, Humanities, 6
  12. Ramachandran, 2021, From Open Data to Open Science. Earth and Space, Science, 8
  13. Reygadas, 2021, Mapping Forest Disturbances across the Southwestern Amazon: Tradeoffs between Open-Source, Landsat-based Algorithms. Environmental Research Communications, 3, 9
  14. Sanders, W. T. (1956). The Central Mexican Symbiotic Region: A Study in Prehistoric Settlement Patterns. in Prehistoric Settlement Patterns in the New World, ed. G. R. Willey, pp. 115-127. Viking Publications in Anthropology, no. 2. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
  15. Willey, 1953, Prehistoric settlement patterns in the Virú; Valley, Peru. Bureau of American Ethnology Bulletin., 155, 1
  16. Wimberly, 2022, Cloud-based applicatons for accessing satellite earth observations to support maleria early warning, Nature Scientific Data., 9
  17. Wong, 2019, Automating offshore infrastructure extractions using synthetic aperture radar and Google Earth Engine, Remote Sens. Environ., 233
  18. Xie, 2021, Mapping annual irrigation from landsat imagery and environmental variables across the coterminous United States, Remote Sens. Environ., 260

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Herndon, K. E., Griffin, R., Schroder, W., Murtha, T., Golden, C., Contreras, D. A., Cherrington, E., Wang, L., Bazarsky, A., Kollias, G. V., & Alcover Firpi, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
Corresponding author
Herndon, Kelsey E.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
50
Pages
104094
ISSN
2352-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4383813200
Cited by
21
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7
FWCI
12.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NSSC20K1265)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Archaeological Research and Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Geophysical Methods and Applications
Keywords
Google Earth Engine, remote sensing of archaeological sites, cloud computing, automated feature detection, deep learning, environmental modeling, cultural heritage monitoring, open science, reproducibility, data access barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review