Cited by 58Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesNatural Compounds in Disease TreatmentNeutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms

Mitochondrial N-formyl methionine peptides associate with disease activity as well as contribute to neutrophil activation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Open access
Duvvuri, Bhargavi, Baddour, Al Anoud, Deane, Kevin D., Feser, Marie L., Nelson, J. Lee, Demoruelle, M. Kristen, Lood, Christian·2021·Journal of Autoimmunity

Abstract

Objectives Literature suggests that neutrophils of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are primed to respond to N-formyl methionine group (formylated peptides). Animal models indicate that formylated peptides contribute to joint damage via neutrophil recruitment and inflammation in joints. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are also known to inhibit formyl peptide-induced neutrophil activation. The predominant source of formylated peptides in sterile inflammatory conditions like RA is mitochondria, organelles with prokaryotic molecular signatures. However, there is no direct evidence of mitochondrial formyl peptides (mtNFPs) in the circulation of patients with RA and their potential role in neutrophil-mediated inflammation in RA, including their clinical significance.Methods Levels of mtNFPs (total fMet, MT-ND6) were analyzed using ELISA in plasma and serum obtained from patients in 3 cross-sectional RA cohorts (n = 275), a longitudinal inception cohort (n = 192) followed for a median of 8 years, and age/gender-matched healthy controls (total n = 134). Neutrophil activation assays were done in the absence or presence of formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) inhibitor cyclosporine H.Results Elevated levels of total fMet were observed in the circulation of patients with RA as compared to healthy controls (p < 0.0001) associating with disease activity and could distinguish patients with the active disease from patients with inactive disease or patients in remission. Baseline levels of total fMet correlated with current and future joint involvement, respectively and predicted the development of rheumatoid nodules (OR = 1.2, p = 0.04). Further, total fMet levels improved the prognostic ability of ACPA in predicting erosive disease (OR of 7.9, p = 0.001). Total fMet levels correlated with markers of inflammation and neutrophil activation. Circulating mtNFPs induced neutrophil activation in vitro through FPR1-dependent mechanisms.Conclusions Circulating mtNFPs could be novel biomarkers of disease monitoring and prognosis for RA and in investigating neutrophil-mediated inflammation in RA. We propose, FPR1 as a novel therapeutic target for RA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102630

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mitochondrial fMet levels can distinguish RA patients by disease activity and are associated with current joint erosion and joint space narrowing at baseline.

    “More importantly, mitochondrial fMet levels can distinguish patients based on disease activity and are associated with current joint erosion and joint space narrowing at baseline.”

    From The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

    The Results report that total fMet levels distinguished RA patients by disease activity in cohorts RA1 and RA4. They also report correlations with current joint erosion and joint space narrowing in RA2, a follow-up cohort, but do not establish those associations at baseline. The paper discusses baseline fMet levels separately when assessing later outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mitochondrial fMet levels are elevated in RA patients compared with healthy individuals and are associated with neutrophil-mediated inflammation and disease progression, including rheumatoid nodules.

    “Mitochondrial fMet levels are elevated in patients with RA compared with healthy individuals and are associated with neutrophil-mediated inflammation and disease progression, including the development of rheumatoid nodules185.”

    From The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

  • Increased mitochondrial fMet peptides in three independent RA cohorts correlate with circulating neutrophil activation markers (NETs, calprotectin, peroxidase) and inflammation markers (CRP, ESR).

    “Specifically, increased levels of mitochondrial fMet peptides, as has been observed in three independent cohorts of patients with RA, correlate with circulating levels of neutrophil activation markers, including levels of NETs, calprotectin and peroxidase, as well as with markers of inflammation (such as C-reactive protein (CRP) level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate).”

    From The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

  • Mitochondrial fMet peptide-mediated signalling is a potential therapeutic target for neutrophil-dominant inflammation in sterile inflammatory conditions such as RA.

    “Furthermore, mitochondrial fMet peptide-mediated signalling is a potential therapeutic target for ameliorating neutrophil-dominant inflammation in sterile inflammatory conditions such as RA185.”

    From The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

  • Mitochondrial fMet peptides in RA plasma can support neutrophil activation in vitro via FPR1.

    “Notably, mitochondrial fMet peptides circulating in the plasma of patients with RA can support neutrophil activation in vitro via FPR1 (as shown by FPR1 blockade experiments)185.”

    From The role of mitochondria in rheumatic diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [185]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 58

Authors
Duvvuri, B., Baddour, A. A., Deane, K. D., Feser, M. L., Nelson, J. L., Demoruelle, M. K., & Lood, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
Corresponding author
Lood, Christian
Venue
Journal of Autoimmunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
119
Pages
102630
ISSN
0896-8411 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3139010036
Cited by
58
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 21
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Autoimmunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • NIH
  • Arthritis National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Neutrophil, Myeloperoxidase and Oxidative Mechanisms
Keywords
rheumatoid arthritis, formyl peptides, neutrophil activation, FPR1, disease activity markers, rheumatoid nodules, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies, erosive disease, joint involvement, neutrophilic inflammation, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Disease Susceptibility, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitochondria, Neutrophils, Peptides, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Case-Control Studies, Reactive Oxygen Species, Neutrophil Activation, Disease Progression, Young Adult, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review