Cited by 4Autophagy in Disease and TherapyFungal and yeast genetics researchRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ribonuclease RNase T2 mediates selective autophagy of ribosomes induced by starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Open access
Minami, Atsushi, Nishi, Kohei, Yamada, Rikusui, Jinnai, Gai, Shima, Hikari, Oishi, Sakiko, Akagawa, Hirofumi, Aono, Toshihiro, Hidaka, Makoto, Masaki, Haruhiko, Kuzuyama, Tomohisa, Noda, Yoichi, Ogawa, Tetsuhiro·2025·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

RNase T2 is a conserved ribonuclease, playing essential and diverse roles despite its simple enzymatic activity. Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase T2, known as Rny1p, is stress-responsive and localizes in the vacuole. Upon starvation, ribosomes are degraded by autophagy, in which Rny1p mediates rRNA degradation. However, whether the ribosomal degradation is selective or nonselective is still being determined in S. cerevisiae. Here, we elucidated novel aspects of ribosome degradation mechanisms and the function of Rny1p in stress response. We discovered that most ribosomes are selectively degraded, whose mechanism differs from the previously reported selective degradation process called "ribophagy." Rsa1p, a factor involved in assembling 60S ribosomal subunits, is revealed to interact with Atg8p and act as a receptor for selective ribosome degradation in the cytosol. The accumulation of rRNA in vacuoles, due to lack of Rny1p, leads to a decrease in nonselective autophagic activity. This is one of the reasons for the inability of Rny1p-deficient strains to adapt to starvation conditions. Rny1p is also reported to be secreted and associated with the cell wall. We revealed that a C-terminal extension of Rny1p, characteristic in some fungal RNase T2, is required to anchor the cell wall. Some nonfungal RNase T2 proteins also have C-terminal extensions. However, their sequences and structures differ from those of fungal RNase T2, suggesting that their biological functions may also be distinct. The diversity of C-terminal extensions across different organisms is thought to be one reason why RNase T2 plays various roles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108554

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Warner, 1999, The economics of ribosome biosynthesis in yeast, Trends Biochem. Sci., 24, 437, 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01460-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Pestov, 2012, Rapid cytoplasmic turnover of yeast ribosomes in response to rapamycin inhibition of TOR, Mol. Cell. Biol., 32, 2135, 10.1128/MCB.06763-11 · DOI
  3. Luhtala, 2010, T2 Family ribonucleases: ancient enzymes with diverse roles, Trends Biochem. Sci., 35, 253, 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kitahara, 2011, Specific inhibition of bacterial RNase T2 by helix 41 of 16S ribosomal RNA, Nat. Commun., 2, 549, 10.1038/ncomms1553 · DOI
  5. Haud, 2011, rnaset2 mutant zebrafish model familial cystic leukoencephalopathy and reveal a role for RNase T2 in degrading ribosomal RNA, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 1099, 10.1073/pnas.1009811107 · DOI
  6. Hillwig, 2011, RNS2, a conserved member of the RNase T2 family, is necessary for ribosomal RNA decay in plants, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 108, 1093, 10.1073/pnas.1009809108 · DOI
  7. Andersen, 2012, Several RNase T2 enzymes function in induced tRNA and rRNA turnover in the ciliate Tetrahymena, Mol. Biol. Cell., 23, 36, 10.1091/mbc.e11-08-0689 · DOI
  8. Acquati, 2001, Cloning and characterization of a senescence inducing and class II tumor suppressor gene in ovarian carcinoma at chromosome region 6q27, Oncogene, 20, 980, 10.1038/sj.onc.1204178 · DOI
  9. Henneke, 2009, RNASET2-deficient cystic leukoencephalopathy resembles congenital cytomegalovirus brain infection, Nat. Genet., 41, 773, 10.1038/ng.398 · DOI
  10. Ostendorf, 2020, Immune sensing of synthetic, bacterial, and protozoan RNA by toll-like receptor 8 requires coordinated processing by RNase T2 and RNase 2, Immunity, 52, 591, 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.03.009 · DOI
  11. Greulich, 2019, TLR8 is a sensor of RNase T2 degradation products, Cell, 179, 1264, 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.001 · DOI
  12. Liu, 2021, Skewed endosomal RNA responses from TLR7 to TLR3 in RNase T2-deficient macrophages, Int. Immunol., 33, 479, 10.1093/intimm/dxab033 · DOI
  13. Miyake, 2022, Nucleic acid sensing by toll-like receptors in the endosomal compartment, Front. Immunol., 13, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.941931 · DOI
  14. Takayama, 2005, Self-incompatibility in plants, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol., 56, 467, 10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144249 · DOI
  15. Hua, 2008, Biochemical models for S-RNase-based self-incompatibility, Mol. Plant, 1, 575, 10.1093/mp/ssn032 · DOI
  16. Schneider, 1993, Identification of a structural glycoprotein of an RNA virus as a ribonuclease, Science, 261, 1169, 10.1126/science.8356450 · DOI
  17. Langedijk, 2002, Translocation activity of C-terminal domain of pestivirus Erns and ribotoxin L3 loop, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5308, 10.1074/jbc.M104147200 · DOI
  18. Makarov, 2003, Cytotoxic ribonucleases: molecular weapons and their targets, FEBS Lett., 540, 15, 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00225-4 · DOI
  19. MacIntosh, 2001, Characterization of Rny1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae member of the T2 RNase family of RNases: unexpected functions for ancient enzymes?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 98, 1018, 10.1073/pnas.98.3.1018 · DOI
  20. Shcherbik, 2013, Golgi-mediated glycosylation determines residency of the T2 RNase Rny1p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Traffic, 14, 1209, 10.1111/tra.12122 · DOI
  21. Deshpande, 2002, Ribonucleases from T2 family, Crit. Rev. Microbiol., 28, 79, 10.1080/1040-840291046704 · DOI
  22. Kraft, 2008, Mature ribosomes are selectively degraded upon starvation by an autophagy pathway requiring the Ubp3p/Bre5p ubiquitin protease, Nat. Cell Biol., 10, 602, 10.1038/ncb1723 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Huang, 2015, Bulk RNA degradation by nitrogen starvation-induced autophagy in yeast, EMBO J., 34, 154, 10.15252/embj.201489083 · DOI
  24. Ossareh-Nazari, 2010, Cdc48 and Ufd3, new partners of the ubiquitin protease Ubp3, are required for ribophagy, EMBO Rep., 11, 548, 10.1038/embor.2010.74 · DOI
  25. Ghislain, 1996, Cdc48p interacts with Ufd3p, a WD repeat protein required for ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, EMBO J., 15, 4884, 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00869.x · DOI
  26. McKeegan, 2007, A dynamic scaffold of pre-snoRNP factors facilitates human box C/D snoRNP assembly, Mol. Cell. Biol., 27, 6782, 10.1128/MCB.01097-07 · DOI
  27. Boulon, 2008, The Hsp90 chaperone controls the biogenesis of L7Ae RNPs through conserved machinery, J. Cell Biol., 180, 579, 10.1083/jcb.200708110 · DOI
  28. Quinternet, 2015, Structure/function analysis of protein–protein interactions developed by the yeast Pih1 platform protein and its partners in box C/D snoRNP assembly, J. Mol. Biol., 427, 2816, 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.012 · DOI
  29. Tatehashi, 2016, γ-Glutamyl kinase is involved in selective autophagy of ribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett., 590, 2906, 10.1002/1873-3468.12318 · DOI
  30. Takeshige, 1992, Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction, J. Cell Biol., 119, 301, 10.1083/jcb.119.2.301 · DOI
  31. Rothé, 2014, Characterization of the interaction between protein Snu13p/15.5K and the Rsa1p/NUFIP factor and demonstration of its functional importance for snoRNP assembly, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 2015, 10.1093/nar/gkt1091 · DOI
  32. Rothé, 2014, Protein Hit1, a novel box C/D snoRNP assembly factor, controls cellular concentration of the scaffolding protein Rsa1 by direct interaction, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 10731, 10.1093/nar/gku612 · DOI
  33. Floyd, 2015, Evidence for autophagy-dependent pathways of rRNA turnover in Arabidopsis, Autophagy, 11, 2199, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1106664 · DOI
  34. Liu, 2018, Autophagy-dependent ribosomal RNA degradation is essential for maintaining nucleotide homeostasis during C. elegans development, Elife, 7, 10.7554/eLife.36588 · DOI
  35. Noda, 2008, The quantitative Pho8Delta60 assay of nonspecific autophagy, Methods Enzymol., 451, 33, 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)03203-5 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Holm, 2020, DALI and the persistence of protein shape, Protein Sci., 29, 128, 10.1002/pro.3749 · DOI
  37. Sagane, 2016, Conformational divergence in the HA-33/HA-17 trimer of serotype C and D botulinum toxin complex, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 476, 280, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.05.113 · DOI
  38. Nakamura, 2008, Sugar-binding sites of the HA1 subcomponent of Clostridium botulinum type C progenitor toxin, J. Mol. Biol., 376, 854, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.031 · DOI
  39. Kobayashi, 2003, A new type of RNase T2 ribonuclease in two Basidiomycetes fungi, Lentinus edodes and Irpex lacteus, Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 67, 2307, 10.1271/bbb.67.2307 · DOI
  40. Hulst, 1994, Glycoprotein E2 of classical swine fever virus: expression in insect cells and identification as a ribonuclease, Virology, 200, 558, 10.1006/viro.1994.1218 · DOI
  41. Floyd, 2017, Localization of RNS2 ribonuclease to the vacuole is required for its role in cellular homeostasis, Planta, 245, 779, 10.1007/s00425-016-2644-x · DOI
  42. Makino, 2021, Selectivity of mRNA degradation by autophagy in yeast, Nat. Commun., 12, 2316, 10.1038/s41467-021-22574-6 · DOI
  43. Samir, 2018, Identification of changing ribosome protein compositions using mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 18
  44. Ibrahim, 2023, AlphaFold2-multimer guided high-accuracy prediction of typical and atypical ATG8-binding motifs, PLoS Biol., 21, 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001962 · DOI
  45. Birgisdottir, 2013, The LIR motif - crucial for selective autophagy, J. Cell Sci., 126, 3237, 10.1242/jcs.126128 · DOI
  46. Evans, 2021, Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer, bioRxiv
  47. Khvorova, 1999, RNAs that bind and change the permeability of phospholipid membranes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 96, 10649, 10.1073/pnas.96.19.10649 · DOI
  48. Matsui, 2020, Graph splitting: a graph-based approach for superfamily-scale phylogenetic tree reconstruction, Syst. Biol., 69, 265
  49. Ohgane, 2019, Quantification of gel bands by an image J macro, band/peak quantification tool v1, protocols.io
  50. Zhang, 2011, An improved method for whole protein extraction from yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Yeast, 28, 795, 10.1002/yea.1905 · DOI
  51. Love, 2019, JASP: graphical statistical software for common statistical designs, J. Stat. Softw., 88, 1, 10.18637/jss.v088.i02 · DOI
  52. Mirdita, 2022, ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all, Nat. Methods, 19, 679, 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Li, 2006, Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences, Bioinformatics, 22, 1658, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl158 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Minami, A., Nishi, K., Yamada, R., Jinnai, G., Shima, H., Oishi, S., Akagawa, H., Aono, T., Hidaka, M., Masaki, H., Kuzuyama, T., Noda, Y., & Ogawa, T.
Affiliations
  • The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Agro-Biotechnology Research Center, The University of Tokyo (JP)
  • Collaborative Research Institute for Innovative Microbiology, The University of Tokyo (JP)
Corresponding author
Ogawa, Tetsuhiro
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-06
Volume
301
Issue
6
Pages
108554
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409839461
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJSP2108)
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (pGMH20, RDB01955, RDB01956)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP25450093, JP20K21266, JP16K07657, JP21K18229, JP23H02122)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
RNase T2, ribosome degradation, selective autophagy, ribophagy, rRNA degradation, vacuoles, cell wall anchoring, C-terminal extension, Saccharomyces cerevisiae
MeSH terms
Autophagy-Related Protein 8 Family, Autophagy, Endoribonucleases, Ribosomes, RNA, Ribosomal, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Vacuoles, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review