SH2-mediated steric occlusion of the C2 domain regulates autoinhibition of SHIP1 inositol 5-phosphatase
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The Src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase 1 (SHIP1) is an immune cell specific enzyme that regulates phosphatidylinositol-(3,4,5)-trisphosphate signaling at the plasma membrane following receptor activation. SHIP1 plays an important role in processes such as directed cell migration, endocytosis, and cortical membrane oscillations. Alterations in SHIP1 expression have been shown to perturb myeloid cell chemotaxis and differentiation. In the brain, SHIP1 regulate microglial cell behaviors, which has been linked to Alzheimer's disease. Understanding the structural and functional relationships of SHIP1 is critical for developing ways to modulate SHIP1 membrane localization and lipid phosphatase activity during immune cell signaling. Recently, we discovered that the N-terminal SH2 domain of SHIP1 suppresses lipid phosphatase activity. SHIP1 autoinhibition can be relieved through interactions with receptor-derived phosphotyrosine (pY) peptides presented on membranes or in solution. Using hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) we identified intramolecular contacts between the N-terminal SH2 domain and CBL1 motif of the C2 domain that limit SHIP1 membrane localization and activity. Single molecule measurements of purified SHIP1 on supported lipid bilayers and in neutrophil-like cells support a model in which the SH2 domain blocks membrane binding of the central catalytic module. Mutations that disrupt autoinhibition enhance the membrane binding frequency and increase the catalytic efficiency of SHIP1. Although dimerization of SHIP1 enhances membrane localization and the apparent phosphatase activity, it is not required for SHIP1 autoinhibition. Overall, our results provide new insight concerning SHIP1's structural organization, membrane binding dynamics, and the mechanism of autoinhibition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Structural Basis for Activation and Inhibition of Class I Phosphoinositide 3-Kinases
Vadas, O., Burke, J. E., Zhang, X., Berndt, A., & Williams, R. L. (2011) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002165 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Self-citationTerzioglu, G., & Young-Pearse, T. L. (2023) · Molecular Neurodegeneration · doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00674-9 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
INPP5D regulates inflammasome activation in human microglia
Chou, V., Pearse, R. V., Aylward, A. J., Ashour, N., Taga, M., Terzioglu, G., Fujita, M., Fancher, S. B., Sigalov, A., Benoit, C. R., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42819-w · Cited by 79 · see citing works
The SH2-domain of SHIP1 interacts with the SHIP1 C-terminus: Impact on SHIP1/Ig-α interaction
Mukherjee, O., Weingarten, L., Padberg, I., Pracht, C., Sinha, R., Hochdörfer, T., Kuppig, S., Backofen, R., Reth, M., & Huber, M. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.11.019 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Drew, E. E., Nyvall, H. G., Parson, M. A. H., Talus, R. K., Burke, J. E., & Hansen, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Oregon (US)
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hansen, Scott D.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2025-12
- Volume
- 301
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 110788
- ISSN
- 0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12424678
- OpenAlex
- W4414920029
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01 GM143406)
- National Research Council Canada
- National Institutes of Health
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC-2020-04241)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Keywords
- SHIP1, SH2 domain, C2 domain, autoinhibition, inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase, steric occlusion, membrane binding, protein dimerization, phosphotyrosine peptides, neutrophils, microglia, hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry, supported lipid bilayers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review