Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Corporate Finance and GovernanceFirm Innovation and GrowthOrganizational Management and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and corporate governance: Evidence from board size

Open access
Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn, Jiraporn, Pornsit, Lee, Sang Mook·2026·Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
DOI 10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101144
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101144

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Babina, 2024, Artificial intelligence, firm growth, and product innovation, J. Financ. Econ., 151
  2. Cath, 2018, Artificial intelligence and the “good society”: The US, EU, and UK approach, Sci. Eng. Ethics, 24, 505
  3. Chatjuthamard, 2023, Corporate culture, innovation, and board size: Recent evidence from machine learning and earnings conference calls, SSRN Electron. J.
  4. Cockburn, 2018, Impact Artif. Intell. Innov., 24449
  5. Hermalin, 2001, Boards Dir. Endog. determined Inst. A Surv. Econ. Lit.
  6. Jensen, 1993, The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, J. Finance, 48, 831, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb04022.x · DOI
  7. Jenter, 2023, Does board size matter?, SSRN Electron. J., 916
  8. Knyazeva, 2013, The supply of corporate directors and board independence, Rev. Financ. Stud., 26, 1561, 10.1093/rfs/hht020 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Konadu, 2022, Board gender diversity, environmental innovation and corporate carbon emissions, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 174
  10. Li, 2010, Textual analysis of corporate disclosures: A survey of the literature, J. Account. Lit., 29, 143
  11. Lipton, 1992, A Modest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance, Bus. Lawyer, 48, 59
  12. Lu, 2022, Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 84
  13. Ongsakul, 2024, Corporate culture and shareholder litigation rights: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment and textual analysis, Rev. Behav. Financ.
  14. Wongsinhirun, 2023, Corporate culture and board gender diversity: Evidence from textual analysis, Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., 86

Cited by

See all 4

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chatjuthamard, P., Jiraporn, P., & Lee, S. M.
Affiliations
  • Chulalongkorn University (TH)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn
  • Jiraporn, Pornsit
  • Lee, Sang Mook
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-03
Volume
49
Pages
101144
ISSN
2214-6350 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbef.2026.101144
OpenAlex
W7124161722
Cited by
4
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
73.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, board size, corporate governance, board governance, R&D-intensive firms, cash reserves, firm adaptability, strategic decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.