The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics
Open accessAbstract
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are frequently used in biomedical informatics research to evaluate classification and prediction models for decision support, diagnosis, and prognosis. ROC analysis investigates the accuracy of a model's ability to separate positive from negative cases (such as predicting the presence or absence of disease), and the results are independent of the prevalence of positive cases in the study population. It is especially useful in evaluating predictive models or other tests that produce output values over a continuous range, since it captures the trade-off between sensitivity and specificity over that range. There are many ways to conduct an ROC analysis. The best approach depends on the experiment; an inappropriate approach can easily lead to incorrect conclusions. In this article, we review the basic concepts of ROC analysis, illustrate their use with sample calculations, make recommendations drawn from the literature, and list readily available software.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems
Hand, D. J., & Till, R. J. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010920819831 · Cited by 2,276
Text Categorization Models for High-Quality Article Retrieval in Internal Medicine
Aphinyanaphongs, Y. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1641 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for evaluating diagnostic tests and predictive models
Zou, K. H., O’Malley, A. J., & Mauri, L. (2007) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.105.594929 · Cited by 1,473
Self-citationthe DIARETDB1 diabetic retinopathy database and evaluation protocol
Kauppi, T., Kalesnykiene, V., Kamarainen, J.-K., Lensu, L., Sorri, I., Raninen, A., Voutilainen, R., Uusitalo, H., Kalviainen, H., & Pietila, J. (2007) · Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2007 · doi:10.5244/c.21.15 · Cited by 854
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384 · Cited by 200
Kim, S., Hwang, J., Xuan, J., Jung, Y. H., Cha, H.-S., & Kim, K. H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0097501 · Cited by 169
Denton, C. A., Barth, A. E., Fletcher, J. M., Wexler, J., Vaughn, S., Cirino, P. T., Romain, M., & Francis, D. J. (2011) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888431003623546 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Lasko, T. A., Bhagwat, J. G., Zou, K. H., & Ohno-Machado, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 404-415
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029426756
- Cited by
- 823
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008
- The paper
- Lasko, T. A., Bhagwat, J. G., Zou, K. H., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2005). The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.