Cited by 200Psychometric Methodologies and TestingSurvey Methodology and NonresponseReliability and Agreement in Measurement

Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies

Goldammer, Philippe, Annen, Hubert, Stöckli, Peter Lucas, Jonas, Klaus·2020·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participation from the comfort of one's own home could have contributed to careless responding and suboptimal effort.

    “Participation from the comfort of one's own home could have contributed to careless responding (Goldammer et al., 2020) and suboptimal effort (DeRight & Jorgensen, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Goldammer, Philippe
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
101384
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3003804331
Cited by
200
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
12.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
Keywords
careless responding, response sets, questionnaire validity, reaction time (psychology), Mahalanobis distance, residual variance, survey data quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review