Cited by 56Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsICT in Developing CommunitiesDigital Mental Health Interventions

A technology selection framework for supporting delivery of patient-oriented health interventions in developing countries

Open access
Chan, Connie V., Kaufman, David R.·2010·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Health information technologies (HIT) have great potential to advance health care globally. In particular, HIT can provide innovative approaches and methodologies to overcome the range of access and resource barriers specific to developing countries. However, there is a paucity of models and empirical evidence informing the technology selection process in these settings. We propose a framework for selecting patient-oriented technologies in developing countries. The selection guidance process is structured by a set of filters that impose particular constraints and serve to narrow the space of possible decisions. The framework consists of three levels of factors: (1) situational factors, (2) the technology and its relationship with health interventions and with target patients, and (3) empirical evidence. We demonstrate the utility of the framework in the context of mobile phones for behavioral health interventions to reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease. This framework can be applied to health interventions across health domains to explore how and whether available technologies can support delivery of the associated types of interventions and with the target populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.09.006

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mobile telemedicine terminals feature higher portability; mobile phones mainly help in behavioral health interventions and fail in real clinical situations.

    “Mobile terminals, conversely, feature a higher portability: typically, mobile phones mainly help in behavioral health interventions, and fail in real clinical situations [58].”

    From Telemedicine for Developing Countries (2016) · cites this paper as [58]

    Section 3.1 describes mobile phones as mobile, and section 3.2.2 discusses their use in behavioral health interventions. But section 3.3 gives contrary clinical examples: phone-based reminders improved tuberculosis medication adherence, and mobile technologies supported remote monitoring and treatment. The paper does not say mobile phones fail in clinical situations. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Design experts apply filters that consider situational factors, technology, target patients, and empirical evidence, rather than selecting systems or tools according to their main features or project requirements.

    “Rather than selecting the system or the tool according to their main features or to the requirements of the project, design experts apply filters which consider situational factors, technology and target patients, and the empirical evidence [58].”

    From Telemedicine for Developing Countries (2016) · cites this paper as [58]

    Section 2 describes high-level filters for selecting patient-oriented technology, and the paper identifies situational factors, technology and target patients, and empirical evidence as its three levels. The paper does not support the contrast that selection is made instead of considering tool features or project requirements: Section 2.3 says the fit between the task, technology, and population informs selection. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Empirical evidence is very limited on the criteria according to which the proper technology would be selected.

    “The empirical evidence is very limited on the criteria according to which the proper technology would be selected, as Chan et al. write”

    From Telemedicine for Developing Countries (2016) · cites this paper as [58]

    Section 2.3, “Empirical evidence,” says evidence to inform technology selection in developing countries “may be sparse” or “may be lacking.” That supports the general point, but the citing sentence turns a qualified possibility into the categorical claim that evidence is “very limited.” (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [42]Sinha C Effect of Mobile Telephony on Empowering Rural Communities in Developing Countries Conference on Digital Divide, Global Development and the Information Society 2005 November 14–16 Tunisia
  2. [49]Chetty M Chetty RG HCI4D: HCI Challenges in the Global South Computer Human Interaction (CHI) 2007 April 28-May 3 2007 San Jose, CA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, C. V., & Kaufman, D. R.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Chan, Connie V.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
300-306
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1992297515
Cited by
56
References
48
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Nursing Research (1R21NR010710)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
technology selection framework, health information technology, developing countries, mobile devices, behavioral health interventions, cardiovascular risk factors, evidence-based decision making, situational factors, intervention delivery
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Humans, Medical Informatics, Software, User-Computer Interface, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review