Cited by 58Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Designing mobile support for glycemic control in patients with diabetes

Open access
Harris, Lynne T., Tufano, James, Le, Tung, Rees, Courtney, Lewis, Ginny A., Evert, Alison B., Flowers, Jan, Collins, Carol +4 more·2010·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of using mobile phones as part of an existing Web-based system for collaboration between patients with diabetes and a primary care team. In design sessions, we tested mobile wireless glucose meter uploads and two approaches to mobile phone-based feedback on glycemic control. Mobile glucose meter uploads combined with graphical and tabular data feedback were the most desirable system features tested. Participants had a mixture of positive and negative reactions to an automated and tailored messaging feedback system for self-management support. Participants saw value in the mobile system as an adjunct to the Web-based program and traditional office-based care. Mobile diabetes management systems may represent one strategy to improve the quality of diabetes care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2010.05.004

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 'Think aloud' protocols may be helpful in feasibility studies, for example in a feasibility study of a technology to deliver behaviour change, the approach was used to allow users to talk about strengths and weaknesses as they attempted to use it.

    “‘Think aloud’ protocols may also be helpful—for example, in one feasibility study of a technology to deliver behaviour change, the approach was used to allow users to talk about the strengths and weaknesses of the technology as they attempted to use it [41].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 14 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, L. T., Tufano, J., Le, T., Rees, C., Lewis, G. A., Evert, A. B., Flowers, J., Collins, C., Hoath, J., Hirsch, I. B., Goldberg, H. I., & Ralston, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Lynne T.
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
S37-S40
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171319638
Cited by
58
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, mobile devices, mobile health, patient feedback, self-management support, primary care, feasibility and acceptability, message tailoring
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Medical Informatics, Self Care, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Telemedicine, Disease Management, Internet, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review