The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 90 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic review of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing
Open accessAbstract
Objective To review published empirical literature on the use of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing.Material and methods A systematic review of the English language literature was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Papers indexed in computing, technology, and medical databases were included if they were empirical, focused on health and/or wellbeing, involved the collection of data via smartphones, and described the utilized technology as passive or requiring minimal user interaction.Results Thirty-five papers were included in the review. Studies were performed around the world, with samples of up to 171 (median n = 15) representing individuals with bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression, older adults, and the general population. The majority of studies used the Android operating system and an array of smartphone sensors, most frequently capturing accelerometry, location, audio, and usage data. Captured data were usually sent to a remote server for processing but were shared with participants in only 40% of studies. Reported benefits of passive sensing included accurately detecting changes in status, behavior change through feedback, and increased accountability in participants. Studies reported facing technical, methodological, and privacy challenges.Discussion Studies in the nascent area of smartphone-based passive sensing for health and wellbeing demonstrate promise and invite continued research and investment. Existing studies suffer from weaknesses in research design, lack of feedback and clinical integration, and inadequate attention to privacy issues. Key recommendations relate to developing passive sensing strategies matching the problem at hand, using personalized interventions, and addressing methodological and privacy challenges.Conclusion As evolving passive sensing technology presents new possibilities for health and wellbeing, additional research must address methodological, clinical integration, and privacy issues. Doing so depends on interdisciplinary collaboration between informatics and clinical experts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Multimodal and intensive sampling data streams (for example, experience sampling and passive measures gathered through smartphones and other electronic devices) used in some MBI studies133 and mental health research broadly134,135 might be particularly promising inputs for machine learning models, given that these models can often handle many correlated predictors136.”
From A common factors perspective on mindfulness-based interventions (2022) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction
Lu, Z. Q. J. (2010) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2010.00646_6.x · Cited by 12,912
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaa8415 · Cited by 9,955
Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention
Rubenstein, L. Z. (2006) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afl084 · Cited by 3,310
The Internet of Things for Health Care: A Comprehensive Survey
Islam, S. M. R., Kwak, D., Kabir, M. H., Hossain, M., & Kwak, K.-S. (2015) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2015.2437951 · Cited by 3,199
The Role of Actigraphy in the Study of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
Ancoli-Israel, S., Cole, R., Alessi, C., Chambers, M., Moorcroft, W., & Pollak, C. P. (2003) · Sleep · doi:10.1093/sleep/26.3.342 · Cited by 2,751
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Smartphone, New Oxford American Dictionary: Oxford University Press, 2017.
- Microphone, New Oxford American Dictionary: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–406 of 406
Naqvi, A., & Naqvi, F. N. (2026) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/103711
Large language models rate human happiness higher than humans do
Fang, L., Zhang, T., Brockmeier, L. C., Zhang, S., Fei, R., Ma, Y., Teng, S., D’Alfonso, S., Koval, P., Jia, H., et al. (2026) · npj Digital Public Health · doi:10.1038/s44482-026-00049-z
Luo, X., Qiu, X., Shi, Y., & Guan, H. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14213644
Meng, K., Hou, M., & Chae, H. (2026) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.125040
Yang, T., Xu, Y., & Wen, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2026.1948298
Dania, S., Joshi, G., & Bhatt, Y. C. (2026) · The BRICS Health Journal · doi:10.47093/3034-4700.2026.3.3.28-48
Metadata
- Authors
- Cornet, V. P., & Holden, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
- Regenstrief Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holden, Richard J.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 77
- Pages
- 120-132
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5793918
- OpenAlex
- W2775819279
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 20
- FWCI
- 4.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging
- National Institutes of Health (K01AG044439)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Keywords
- health monitoring, well-being, smartphone sensors, accelerometry, location data, audio data, usage data, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, depression, older adults, privacy, clinical integration, personalized interventions
- MeSH terms
- Behavior Observation Techniques, Data Accuracy, Smartphone, Confidentiality, Health Status, Humans, Mental Health, Health Behavior, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review