The DOI matches its Crossref record; 176 of the 182 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wearable activity trackers, accuracy, adoption, acceptance and health impact: A systematic literature review
Open accessAbstract
Wearable activity trackers (WAT) are electronic monitoring devices that enable users to track and monitor their health-related physical fitness metrics including steps taken, level of activity, walking distance, heart rate, and sleep patterns. Despite the proliferation of these devices in various contexts of use and rising research interests, there is limited understanding of the broad research landscape. The purpose of this systematic review is therefore to synthesize the existing wealth of research on WAT, and to provide a comprehensive summary based on common themes and approaches. This article includes academic work published between 2013 and 2017 in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, and Google Scholar. A final list of 463 articles was analyzed for this review. Topic modeling methods were used to identify six key themes (topics) of WAT research, namely: (1) Technology Focus, (2) Patient Treatment and Medical Settings, (3) Behavior Change, (4) Acceptance and Adoption (Abandonment), (5) Self-monitoring Data Centered, and (6) Privacy. We take an interdisciplinary approach to wearable activity trackers to propose several new research questions. The most important research gap we identify is to attempt to understand the rich human-information interaction that is enabled by WAT adoption.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Wearable devices hold great promise, particularly for data generation for cutting-edge health research, and their demand has risen considerably in the last few years [1-3].”
From The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Many studies have focused on novel technologies, presenting prototypes, or investigating the feasibility and acceptance of a wearable device in a specific setting [3,27].”
From The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Similar to other reviews, most devices were wrist-worn fitness trackers and accelerometers, and most of them are from the company Fitbit, measuring PA, HR, and sleep [3,27,31,224,225].”
From The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“These vital signs and device types seem to become the standard in wearable research [3,27,31,224,225].”
From The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
In the citing paper
“Overall, we have identified a positive trend in wearable studies, underlining the growing interest in wearables in health research, in line with other reviews [3,224-226].”
From The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Dowling, J. E., & Wald, G. (2009) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1981.tb06752.x · Cited by 17,937
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.003.0082 · Cited by 12,683
Griffiths, T. L., & Steyvers, M. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101 · Cited by 6,049
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20
Bonilla, E. V., Chai, K. M. A., & Williams, C. K. I. (2008) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2,701
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Mark, G., Fussell, S. R., Lampe, C., Schraefel, M., Hourcade, J., Appert, C., & Wigdor, D. J. (2017) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453 · Cited by 2,222
Models in information behaviour research
Wilson, T. D. (1999) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007145 · Cited by 2,104
Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Doyle, C., Bandera, E. V., McCullough, M., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., Thun, M. J., & The American Cancer Society 2006 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2006) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254 · Cited by 1,901
(2009) · Cited by 1,900
Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: A Longitudinal and Cross-Disciplinary Comparison
Harzing, A.-W., & Alakangas, S. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1798-9 · Cited by 1,784
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Cyr, 2014, Security analysis of wearable fitness devices (fitbit), Massachusetts Inst. Technol., 1
- Sena, 2015, Validity and usability testing of the fitbit pedometer in patients with COPD, European Respiratory J.: Official J. European Soc. Clin. Respiratory Physiol., 46, PA2067
- Ledger, 2014, Inside wearables: how the science of human behavior change offers the secret to long-term engagement, Endeavour Partners, 200, 1
- Motti, 2014, Human factors considerations in the design, Human Factors, 927–931
- IDC. Worldwide Wearables Market Grows 7.3% in Q3 2017 as Smart Wearables Rise and Basic Wearables Decline, Says IDC. Press release from IDC on November 30, 2017. https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS43260217. Accessed March 25, 2019.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Canali, S., Schiaffonati, V., & Aliverti, A. (2022) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000104 · Cited by 457
The impact of wearable technologies in health research: scoping review
Huhn, S., Axt, M., Gunga, H.-C., Maggioni, M. A., Munga, S., Obor, D., Sié, A., Boudo, V., Bunker, A., Sauerborn, R., et al. (2022) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/34384 · Cited by 379
“Wearable devices hold great promise, particularly for data generation for cutting-edge health research, and their demand has risen considerably in the last few years [1-3].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialReview on Wearable Technology Sensors Used in Consumer Sport Applications
Aroganam, G., Manivannan, N., & Harrison, D. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19091983 · Cited by 416
“This is a way of using observational methods for monitoring injury patterns.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X. (2020) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104156 · Cited by 373
Moore, K., O'Shea, E., Kenny, L., Barton, J., Tedesco, S., Sica, M., Crowe, C., Alamäki, A., Condell, J., Nordström, A., et al. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/23832 · Cited by 278
“This meta-synthesis is more in-depth than previous systematic reviews on wearable devices that summarized a group of studies [4,5,18-23], analyzed a series of trials [24], or reviewed the state of the art [25,26].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, G., Jarrahi, M. H., Fei, Y., Karami, A., Gafinowitz, N., Byun, A., & Lu, X.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Seoul National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Shin, Grace
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 93
- Pages
- 103153
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2927358919
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 182
- Citations by year
- 2026: 23 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 9
- FWCI
- 7.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- wearable activity trackers, physical activity monitoring, device accuracy, technology adoption, user acceptance, abandonment, behavior change, self-monitoring, privacy, human-computer interaction, health effects, wearable sensors
- MeSH terms
- Fitness Trackers, Adult, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
