Cited by 52Biomedical Text Mining and OntologiesMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Matching patients to clinical trials using semantically enriched document representation

Open access
Hassanzadeh, Hamed, Karimi, Sarvnaz, Nguyen, Anthony·2020·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Recruiting eligible patients for clinical trials is crucial for reliably answering specific questions about medical interventions and evaluation. However, clinical trial recruitment is a bottleneck in clinical research and drug development. Our goal is to provide an approach towards automating this manual and time-consuming patient recruitment task using natural language processing and machine learning techniques. Specifically, our approach extracts key information from series of narrative clinical documents in patient's records and collates helpful evidence to make decisions on eligibility of patients according to certain inclusion and exclusion criteria. Challenges in applying narrative clinical documents such as differences in reporting styles and sub-languages are addressed by enriching them with knowledge from domain ontologies in the form of semantic vector representations. We show that a machine learning model based on Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) is more effective for the task than five other neural networks and four conventional machine learning models. Our approach achieves overall micro-F1-Score of 84% for 13 different eligibility criteria. Our experiments also indicate that semantically enriched documents are more effective than using original documents for cohort selection. Our system provides an end-to-end machine learning-based solution that achieves comparable results with the state-of-the-art which relies on hand-crafted rules or data-centric engineered features.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103406

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BERT-based tools have been used for subject matching across various diseases while struggling with generalizability.

    “Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based tools have been used for subject matching across various diseases while struggling with generalizability [4–7].”

    From Enhancing hepatopathy clinical trial efficiency: a secure, large language model-powered pre-screening pipeline (2025) · cites this paper as [6]

    Section 2.3 mentions BERT as a contextual text representation, but does not describe a BERT-based patient-matching tool. Section 5.2 attributes poor generalisability to rule-based systems; it says deep-learning approaches are more transferable and generalisable, contrary to the claim’s generalisability point. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. F.S. Kury, V. Huser, J.J. Cimino, Reproducing a prospective clinical study as a computational retrospective study in MIMIC-II, in: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, American Medical Informatics Association, Washington, DC, 2015, pp. 804-813.
  2. K. Kreimeyer, M. Foster, A. Pandey, N. Arya, G. Halford, S.F. Jones, R. Forshee, M. Walderhaug, T. Botsis, Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: a systematic review, J. Biomed. Informatics 73 (2017) 14-29.
  3. T. Mikolov, I. Sutskever, K. Chen, G.S. Corrado, J. Dean, Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality, in: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, 2013, pp. 3111-3119.
  4. J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, K. Toutanova, BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirec- tional transformers for language understanding, in: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2019, pp. 4171-4186.
  5. J. Mitchell, M. Lapata, Vector-based models of semantic composition, in: The Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics with the Human Language Technology Conference, Columbus, OH, 2008, pp. 236-244.
  6. Q. Le, T. Mikolov, Distributed representations of sentences and documents, in: 31st International Conference on Machine Learning, Beijing, China, 2014, pp. 1188-1196.
  7. R. Rehruvrek, P. Sojka, Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora, in: LREC Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, Valletta, Malta, 2010, pp. 45-50.
  8. B. Neyshabur, S. Bhojanapalli, D. McAllester, N. Srebro, Exploring generalization in deep learning, in: International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, 2017, pp. 5947-5956.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassanzadeh, H., Karimi, S., & Nguyen, A.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Data61 (AU)
Corresponding author
Hassanzadeh, Hamed
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
105
Pages
103406
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3011079674
Cited by
52
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Digital Health (1134919)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient recruitment, semantic enrichment, domain ontology, multilayer perceptron, eligibility criteria, cohort selection, natural language processing
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Humans, Language, Natural Language Processing, Semantics, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review