Cited by 37Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

RadioBERT: A deep learning-based system for medical report generation from chest X-ray images using contextual embeddings

Open access
Kaur, Navdeep, Mittal, Ajay·2022·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Background Increasing number of chest X-ray (CXR) examinations in radiodiagnosis departments burdens radiologists' and makes the timely generation of accurate radiological reports highly challenging. An automatic radiological report generation (ARRG) system is envisaged to generate radiographic reports with minimal human intervention, ease radiologists' burden, and smoothen the clinical workflow. The success of an ARRG system depends on two critical factors: i) quality of the features extracted by the ARRG system from the CXR images, and ii) quality of the linguistic expression generated by the ARRG system describing the normalities and abnormalities as indicated by the extracted features. Most of the existing ARRG systems miserably fail due to the latter factor and do not generate clinically acceptable reports because they ignore the contextual importance of the medical terms.Objectives The advent of contextual word embeddings, like ELMo and BERT, has revolutionized several natural language processing (NLP) tasks. A contextual embedding represents a word based on its context. The main objective of this work is to develop an ARRG system that uses contextual word embeddings to generate clinically accurate reports from CXR images.Methods We present an end-to-end deep neural network that uses contextual word representations for generating clinically useful radiological reports from CXR images. The proposed network, termed as RadioBERT, uses DistilBERT for contextual word representation and leverages transfer learning. Additionally, due to the importance of abnormal observations over the normal ones, the network reorders the generated sentences by applying sentiment analysis to keep abnormal descriptions on the top of the generated report.Results The empirical study consisting of several experiments performed on the OpenI dataset indicates that CNN+Hierarchical LSTM with DistilBERT embedding improves the benchmark performance. We have been able to achieve the following performance scores: BLEU-1 = 0.772, BLEU-2 = 0.770, BLEU-3 = 0.768, BLEU-4 = 0.767, CIDEr = 0.5563, and ROUGE = 0.897.Conclusion The proposed method improves the state-of-the-art performance scores by a substantial margin. It is concluded that the use of word embeddings generated by DistilBERT enhances the performance of hierarchical LSTM for producing clinical reports by significant margin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104220

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing studies on automatic FFA interpretation suffer from insufficient model performance and inadequate evaluation metrics.

    “Secondly, existing studies are also suffering from insufficient model performance and inadequate evaluation metrics10,13.”

    From Generative artificial intelligence for fundus fluorescein angiography interpretation and human expert evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [13]

    Section 3.2 explains that a commonly used evaluation metric can score reports highly even when they miss abnormalities. Sections 4.3 and 5 describe errors in chest X-ray report generation and scope for better evaluation of clinical efficacy. The paper concerns chest X-rays, not automatic FFA interpretation, so it does not establish these shortcomings for FFA studies. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Hoo-Chang Shin, Kirk Roberts, Le Lu, Dina Demner-Fushman, Jianhua Yao, Ronald M Summers, Learning to read chest x-rays: Recurrent neural cascade model for automated image annotation, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, pp. 2497-2506.
  2. Kelvin Xu, Jimmy Ba, Ryan Kiros, Kyunghyun Cho, Aaron Courville, Ruslan Salakhudinov, Rich Zemel, Yoshua Bengio, Show, attend and tell: Neural image caption generation with visual attention, in: International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR, 2015, pp. 2048-2057.
  3. Baoyu Jing, Pengtao Xie, Eric Xing, On the automatic generation of medical imaging reports, 2017, arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.08195. · arXiv
  4. Jianbo Yuan, Haofu Liao, Rui Luo, Jiebo Luo, Automatic radiology report generation based on multi-view image fusion and medical concept enrichment, in: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, Springer, 2019, pp. 721-729.
  5. Yuan Li, Xiaodan Liang, Zhiting Hu, Eric P. Xing, Hybrid retrieval-generation reinforced agent for medical image report generation, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2018, pp. 1530-1540.
  6. Yuxuan Xiong, Bo Du, Pingkun Yan, Reinforced transformer for medical image captioning, in: International Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Springer, 2019, pp. 673-680.
  7. Chin-Yew Lin, ROUGE: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries, in: Text Summarization Branches Out, 2004, pp. 74-81.
  8. Jacob Devlin Ming-Wei Chang Kenton, Lee Kristina Toutanova, BERT: Pre- training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, in: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171-4186.
  9. Baoyu Jing, Zeya Wang, Eric Xing, Show, describe and conclude: On exploiting the structure information of chest X-Ray reports, 2020, arXiv preprint arXiv: 2004.12274. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaur, N., & Mittal, A.
Affiliations
Panjab University (IN)
Corresponding author
Mittal, Ajay
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
135
Pages
104220
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4304084022
Cited by
37
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (TDP/BDTD/45/2021)
  • Ministry of Electronics and Information technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
chest radiography, contextual word embeddings, DistilBERT, hierarchical LSTM, clinical text generation, anomaly detection, sentiment analysis, transfer learning
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Linguistics, Natural Language Processing, X-Rays, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review