The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of sericin/collagen membranes as prospective wound dressing biomaterial
Open accessAbstract
Sericin, a silk protein, has high potential for use in biomedical applications. In this study, wound dressing membranes of Sericin (S) and Collagen (C) were prepared by glutaraldehyde cross-linking at S/C; 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, and 0:1 weight ratios. They were stable in water for 4 weeks. However, increasing the proportion of sericin had decreasing effect on the membrane stability. Water swelling property of membranes was enhanced with sericin. The highest water swelling was obtained in 1:1 group (9.06 g/g), but increasing collagen or sericin content in the membranes had a diminishing effect. Highest water vapor transmission rate was obtained with 1:2 group (1013.80 g/m(2)/day). Oxygen permeability results showed that 1:2 (7.67 mg/L) and 2:1 (7.85 mg/L) S/C groups were better than the other groups. While sericin decreased the tensile strength and elongation of membranes, it increased modulus. Sericin also increased brittleness of membranes, but their UTS range (24.93-44.92 MPa) was still suitable for a wound dressing. Membranes were not penetrable to microorganisms. Cytotoxicity studies showed that fibroblasts and keratinocytes attached and gained their characteristic morphologies. They also proliferated on membranes significantly. After 1 week of subcutaneous implantation, a fibrous capsule formed around all membranes with an acute inflammation. Sericin containing membranes showed signs of degradation (at 2nd week), while collagen only membranes remained largely intact. Eventually, sericin containing membranes degraded in 3 weeks with moderate inflammatory response. Overall results suggest that sericin/collagen membranes would be favorable as wound dressing material when sericin ratio is less than or equal to the collagen component.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foreign body reaction to biomaterials
Anderson, J. M., Rodriguez, A., & Chang, D. T. (2008) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 · Cited by 5,138
Kao, W. J., Zhao, Q. H., Hiltner, A., & Anderson, J. M. (1994) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research · doi:10.1002/jbm.820280110 · Cited by 85
Cited by
Bacterial cellulose and bacterial cellulose–chitosan membranes for wound dressing applications
Lin, W.-C., Lien, C.-C., Yeh, H.-J., Yu, C.-M., & Hsu, S.-H. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.076 · Cited by 686
Silk proteins for biomedical applications: Bioengineering perspectives
Kundu, B., Kurland, N. E., Bano, S., Patra, C., Engel, F. B., Yadavalli, V. K., & Kundu, S. C. (2014) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.09.002 · Cited by 451
Silk biomaterials in wound healing and skin regeneration therapeutics: From bench to bedside
Chouhan, D., & Mandal, B. B. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.11.050 · Cited by 348
Wang, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J., Huang, L., Liu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, G., Kundu, S. C., & Wang, L. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07064 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Akturk, O., Tezcaner, A., Bilgili, H., Deveci, M. S., Gecit, M. R., & Keskin, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 279-288
- ISSN
- 1347-4421 (ISSN-L)
- 1389-1723
- OpenAlex
- W2002704223
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of sericin/collagen membranes as prospective wound dressing biomaterial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.05.014
- The paper
- Akturk, O., Tezcaner, A., Bilgili, H., Deveci, M. S., Gecit, M. R., & Keskin, D. (2011). Evaluation of sericin/collagen membranes as prospective wound dressing biomaterial. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2011.05.014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.