Cited by 38Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineXenotransplantation and immune response3D Printing in Biomedical Research

Preparation of immunogen-reduced and biocompatible extracellular matrices from porcine liver

Park, Kyung-Mee, Park, Sung-Min, Yang, Se-Ran, Hong, Seok-Ho, Woo, Heung-Myong·2013·Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Abstract

Decellularized biologic matrices are plausible biomedical materials for the bioengineering in liver transplantation. However, one of the concerns for safe medical application is the lack of objective assessment of the immunogen within the materials and the in vivo immune responses to the matrices. The purpose of this study was the production of immunogen-reduced and biocompatible matrices from porcine liver. In the present study, 0.1% SDS solution was effective for removing DNA fragments and sequences encoding possible immunogenic and viral antigens within the matrices. The PCR analysis showed that galactose-α-1,3 galactose β-1,4-N-acetylglucosamine (1,3 gal), swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) were completely removed in the matrices. Collagen and glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were preserved over 63%-71%, respectively, compared to those of native liver. The implanted decellularized tissues showed minimal host responses and naturally degraded within 10 weeks. In this study, we produced immunogen-reduced and biocompatible extracellular matrices from porcine liver. Although future investigations would be required to determine the mechanism of the host reaction, this study could provide useful information of porcine liver-derived biologic matrices for liver researches.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.08.023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, K.-M., Park, S.-M., Yang, S.-R., Hong, S.-H., & Woo, H.-M.
Affiliations
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Woo, Heung-Myong
Venue
Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
207-215
ISSN
  • 1347-4421 (ISSN-L)
  • 1389-1723
OpenAlex
W2063692778
Cited by
38
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Rural Development Administration (PJ008030, PJ008032)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
decellularized extracellular matrix, porcine liver, immunogenicity reduction, swine leukocyte antigen, porcine endogenous retroviruses, collagen, glycosaminoglycans, biocompatibility, liver transplantation, xenotransplantation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Biocompatible Materials, Cell Separation, Collagen, DNA, Extracellular Matrix, Glycosaminoglycans, Graft Rejection, Liver, Transplantation, Heterologous, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Liver Transplantation, Endogenous Retroviruses, Tissue Engineering, Sus scrofa, Guided Tissue Regeneration, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review