The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris
Open accessAbstract
The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris (Komagataella phaffii) is one of the most commonly used expression systems for heterologous protein production. However the recombination machinery in P. pastoris is less effective in contrast to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where efficient homologous recombination naturally facilitates genetic modifications. The lack of simple and efficient methods for gene disruption and specifically integrating cassettes has remained a bottleneck for strain engineering in P. pastoris. Therefore tools and methods for targeted genome modifications are of great interest. Here we report the establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 technologies for P. pastoris and demonstrate targeting efficiencies approaching 100%. However there appeared to be a narrow window of optimal conditions required for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 function for this host. We systematically tested combinations of various codon optimized DNA sequences of CAS9, different gRNA sequences, RNA Polymerase III and RNA Polymerase II promoters in combination with ribozymes for the expression of the gRNAs and RNA Polymerase II promoters for the expression of CAS9. Only 6 out of 95 constructs were functional for efficient genome editing. We used this optimized CRISPR/Cas9 system for gene disruption studies, to introduce multiplexed gene deletions and to test the targeted integration of homologous DNA cassettes. This system allows rapid, marker-less genome engineering in P. pastoris enabling unprecedented strain and metabolic engineering applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1225829 · Cited by 17,116
Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems
Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., Hsu, P. D., Wu, X., Jiang, W., Marraffini, L. A., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231143 · Cited by 15,339
RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1232033 · Cited by 9,210
ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering
Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., & Barbas, C. F. (2013) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.04.004 · Cited by 3,820
CRISPR-Mediated Modular RNA-Guided Regulation of Transcription in Eukaryotes
Gilbert, L. A., Larson, M. H., Morsut, L., Liu, Z., Brar, G. A., Torres, S. E., Stern-Ginossar, N., Brandman, O., Whitehead, E. H., Doudna, J. A., et al. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.044 · Cited by 3,696 · cited 18×
“In contrast to mRNAs of protein coding genes, which are transcribed by RNA Pol II, transcripts of RNA Pol III do not contain a 5‟-7-methylguanosine cap (5‟cap) and a 3‟ polyA tail.”
InfluentialCRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes
Sander, J. D., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2842 · Cited by 3,153 · cited 1×
“…9) was reported to mediate targeted genome engineering in various pro- and eukaryotic hosts (DiCarlo et al., 2013; Jacobs et al., 2014; Jinek et al., 2012; Mali et al., 2013; Sander and Joung, 2014) and in principle there is no reason why this technology should not be applicable in any organism.”
The Transcriptional Landscape of the Yeast Genome Defined by RNA Sequencing
Nagalakshmi, U., Wang, Z., Waern, K., Shou, C., Raha, D., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158441 · Cited by 2,479
Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs
Fu, Y., Sander, J. D., Reyon, D., Cascio, V. M., & Joung, J. K. (2014) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2808 · Cited by 1,993 · cited 17×
“In contrast to mRNAs of protein coding genes, which are transcribed by RNA Pol II, transcripts of RNA Pol III do not contain a 5‟-7-methylguanosine cap (5‟cap) and a 3‟ polyA tail.”
InfluentialGenome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems
DiCarlo, J. E., Norville, J. E., Mali, P., Rios, X., Aach, J., & Church, G. M. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt135 · Cited by 1,566
A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases
Kim, H., & Kim, J.-S. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3686 · Cited by 1,163
Metadata
- Authors
- Weninger, A., Hatzl, A.-M., Schmid, C., Vogl, T., & Glieder, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 235
- Pages
- 139-149
- ISSN
- 0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2305813535
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 11.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.027
- The paper
- Weninger, A., Hatzl, A.-M., Schmid, C., Vogl, T., & Glieder, A. (2016). Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Journal of Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.03.027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.