Cited by 170Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPregnancy-related medical research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exercise and nonspecific low back pain: A literature review

Henchoz, Yves, Kai-Lik So, Alexander·2008·Joint Bone Spine

Abstract

We reviewed the literature to clarify the effects of exercise in preventing and treating nonspecific low back pain. We evaluated several characteristics of exercise programs including specificity, individual tailoring, supervision, motivation enhancement, volume, and intensity. The results show that exercise is effective in the primary and secondary prevention of low back pain. When used for curative treatment, exercise diminishes disability and pain severity while improving fitness and occupational status in patients who have subacute, recurrent, or chronic low back pain. Patients with acute low back pain are usually advised to continue their everyday activities to the greatest extent possible rather than to start an exercise program. Supervision is crucial to the efficacy of exercise programs. Whether general or specific exercises are preferable is unclear, and neither is there clear evidence that one-on-one sessions are superior to group sessions. Further studies are needed to determine which patient subsets respond to specific characteristics of exercise programs and which exercise volumes and intensities are optimal.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbspin.2008.03.003

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 62 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–169 of 169

Metadata

Authors
Henchoz, Y., & Kai-Lik So, A.
Affiliations
University of Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Henchoz, Yves
Venue
Joint Bone Spine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-10
Volume
75
Issue
5
Pages
533-539
ISSN
1297-319X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100834879
Cited by
170
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Joint Bone Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
non-specific low back pain, exercise therapy, training specificity, supervised exercise, exercise intensity and volume, individualized exercise program, primary prevention, secondary prevention, chronic low back pain, acute low back pain, disability, pain intensity, occupational status
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Pain Measurement, Severity of Illness Index, Exercise, MEDLINE, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review