Cited by 879Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPregnancy-related medical researchSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology

Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain

Open access
Hayden, Jill, van Tulder, Maurits W, Malmivaara, Antti, Koes, Bart W·2005·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exercise therapy is widely used as an intervention in low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of exercise therapy in adult non-specific acute, subacute and chronic low-back pain versus no treatment and other conservative treatments. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, CINAHL databases to October 2004; citation searches and bibliographic reviews of previous systematic reviews. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials evaluating exercise therapy for adult non-specific low-back pain and measuring pain, function, return-to-work/absenteeism, and/or global improvement outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently selected studies and extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and outcomes at short, intermediate, and long-term follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: Sixty-one randomized controlled trials (6390 participants) met inclusion criteria: acute (11), subacute (6) and chronic (43) low-back pain (1 unclear). Evidence was found of effectiveness in chronic populations relative to comparisons at all follow-up periods; pooled mean improvement was 7.3 points (95% CI, 3.7 to 10.9) for pain (out of 100), 2.5 points (1.0 to 3.9) for function (out of 100) at earliest follow-up. In studies investigating patients (i.e. presenting to healthcare providers) mean improvement was 13.3 points (5.5 to 21.1) for pain, 6.9 (2.2 to 11.7) for function, representing significantly greater improvement over studies where participants included those recruited from a general population (e.g. with advertisements). There is some evidence of effectiveness of graded-activity exercise program in subacute low-back pain in occupational settings, though the evidence for other types of exercise therapy in other populations is inconsistent. There was evidence of equal effectiveness relative to comparisons in acute populations [pain: 0.03 points (95% CI, -1.3 to 1.4)]. LIMITATIONS: This review largely reflects limitations of the literature, including low quality studies with heterogeneous outcome measures, inconsistent and poor reporting, and possibility of publication bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy appears to be slightly effective at decreasing pain and improving function in adults with chronic low-back pain, particularly in healthcare populations. In subacute low-back pain there is some evidence that a graded activity program improves absenteeism outcomes, though evidence for other types of exercise is unclear. In acute low-back pain, exercise therapy is as effective as either no treatment or other conservative treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd000335.pub2

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kladny 2003 {published data only} Kladny B, Fischer FC, Haase I. [Evaluation of specific stablizing exercise in the treatment of low back pain and lumbar disk disease in outpatient rehabilitation][German]. Zeitschri fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgbiete 2003;141:401-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayden, J., van Tulder, M. W., Malmivaara, A., & Koes, B. W.
Affiliations
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • VU University; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences; PO Box 7057 Room U454 Amsterdam Netherlands 1007 MB
  • Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-07-20
Volume
2011
Issue
2
Pages
CD000335-CD000335
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W1779075490
Cited by
879
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 41 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 49
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Keywords
exercise therapy, non-specific low back pain, chronic low back pain, acute low back pain, subacute low back pain, analgesia, functional improvement, return to work, absenteeism, conservative treatment, exercise adherence, publication bias
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review