Effects of exposure in single and multiple contexts on fear renewal: The moderating role of threat-specific and nonspecific emotionality
Abstract
Background and objectives The current study examines effects of exposure in multiple contexts on fear reduction and renewal and the moderating effect of baseline threat-specific and nonspecific emotionality. Methods Snake-fearful participants received a negative or neutral emotion induction and were randomized to video exposure to a snake in a single context, multiple context, or a no exposure control group. Results Anxiety in response to video presentations of a snake was significantly reduced in the two exposure groups compared to the control group, especially among those with heightened baseline threat-specific emotionality as indicated by snake anxiety ratings at baseline. Although the two exposure groups did not differ in responding when confronted with a novel snake, both exposure groups reported significantly lower snake anxiety and arousal than the control group. Subsequent analysis did show that compared to controls, the single context group demonstrated greater increase in anxiety and arousal from post-exposure to exposure to the novel snake among those with heightened snake anxiety at baseline. Furthermore, the multiple context group was less avoidant and less fearful than the single context group on a post-exposure behavioral test. Limitations The study used an analogue exposure paradigm with an analogue sample and findings may not be generalizable to a clinical population. Conclusions These findings suggest that baseline threat-specific emotionality influences fe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In laboratory studies, using multiple contexts during exposure led to less renewal of fear in spider phobia and snake phobia than single-context exposure.
“In laboratory studies, the use of multiple contexts during exposure has led to less renewal of fear in those with spider phobia (Bandarian-Balooch, Neumann, & Boschen, 2015; Shiban, Pauli, & Mühlberger, 2013) and snake phobia (Olatunji, Tomarken, Wentworth, & Fritzsche, 2017) compared to those with whom exposure was conducted in a single context.”
From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Olatunji, Tomarken, Wentworth, & Fritzsche, 2017
Cites
Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach
Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006 · Cited by 2,339 · see citing works
Fear Extinction and Relapse: State of the Art
Vervliet, B., Craske, M. G., & Hermans, D. (2013) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185542 · Cited by 671 · cited 1× · see citing works
“One interpretation of this literature is that some processes may moderate the extent to which exposure in multiple contexts effectively attenuates the renewal effect (Vervliet et al., 2013).”
BackgroundFoa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Massie, E. D., & Yarczower, M. (1995) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(05)80096-6 · Cited by 496 · see citing works
Huitema, B. E. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118067475 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Feelings Into Words: Contributions of Language to Exposure Therapy
Kircanski, K., Lieberman, M. D., & Craske, M. G. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612443830 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Effects of varied-stimulus exposure training on fear reduction and return of fear
Rowe, M. K., & Craske, M. G. (1998) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)10017-1 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Vansteenwegen, D., Hermans, D., Vervliet, B., Francken, G., Beckers, T., Baeyens, F., & Eelen, P. (2005) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2004.01.001 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Context effects on habituation to disgust-relevant stimuli
Viar-Paxton, M. A., & Olatunji, B. O. (2012) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445512446189 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure
Knowles, K. A., & Olatunji, B. O. (2019) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2017.12.001 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Olatunji, B. O., Tomarken, A., Wentworth, B., & Fritzsche, L.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Olatunji, Bunmi O.
- Venue
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-03
- Volume
- 54
- Pages
- 270-277
- ISSN
- 0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2529681355
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Keywords
- fear renewal, fear extinction, snake phobia, emotion induction, avoidance behavior, inhibitory learning, anxiety reduction
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Emotions, Fear, Female, Humans, Implosive Therapy, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Snakes, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review