Cited by 29Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Context effects on habituation to disgust-relevant stimuli

Viar-Paxton, Megan A., Olatunji, Bunmi O.·2012·Behavior Modification

Abstract

Although exposure-based treatments appear to be efficacious for the treatment of anxiety-related disorders, many individuals experience a renewal of the original fear response at follow-up. In an effort to prevent fear renewal, researchers have begun to use exposure of the conditioned stimulus in different contexts during extinction. Although studies continue to accumulate, showing that conducting exposure in multiple contexts buffers against the renewal of distress responses to fear-relevant stimuli, it remains unclear how conducting exposure in multiple contexts affects the renewal of distress responses to disgust-relevant stimuli. In the present study, participants (N = 52) were randomized to repeated presentations of disgust stimuli (vomiting in a toilet) in a single context or multiple contexts. Results revealed that those in the single context condition reported less distress after the exposure manipulation compared with the multiple context condition. Although there were no significant group differences in distress toward a novel disgust stimulus, the single context condition reported greater distress renewal than the multiple context condition. Furthermore, individuals in the multiple context condition showed significant reductions in distress at 1-week follow-up whereas distress in the single context condition remained stable. Subsequent analyses also provided moderate evidence for an effect of the disgust context manipulation on physiological arousal and disgust pro…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445512446189

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using multiple contexts reduces distress toward disgust stimuli.

    “The use of multiple contexts has also been found to reduce distress toward disgust stimuli, which may have implications for disorders in which disgust plays a crucial role, such as contamination-based OCD (Viar-Paxton & Olatunji, 2012).”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as Viar-Paxton & Olatunji, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viar-Paxton, M. A., & Olatunji, B. O.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2012-05-22
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
705-722
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2169380738
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH018921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
disgust, context effects, habituation, fear extinction, fear renewal, exposure therapy, physiological arousal, disgust propensity, avoidance behavior, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Avoidance Learning, Emotions, Extinction, Psychological, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review