CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 143Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchFuzzy and Soft Set TheorySocial Policy and Reform Studies

Fuzzy set ideal type analysis

Kvist, Jon·2007·Journal of Business Research
DOI 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combining of inductive reasoning typical of qualitative methods and the formal systematic cross-comparisons allowed by QCA naturally lends to typology building or typological extensions of existing theories.

    “the combining of inductive reasoning typical of qualitative methods and the formal systematic cross-comparisons allowed by QCA naturally lends to typology building or typological extensions of existing theories (e.g., Hotho, 2014; Kvist, 2007).”

    From Embracing Causal Complexity: The Emergence of a Neo-Configurational Perspective (2017) · cites this paper as Kvist, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kvist, J.
Affiliations
Danish National Centre for Social Research (DK)
Corresponding author
Kvist, Jon
ORCID
Kvist, Jon
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
474-481
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.005
OpenAlex
W1994485776
Cited by
143
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
ideal types, fuzzy set theory, Weberian ideal type, membership degree, comparative welfare state analysis, unemployment policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review